one limitation of OGC API Features is the supported encodings that are not suited for 3D. However, at the 3DPS SWG meeting last week, Josh pointed out that one of the encodings is mandatory and other encodings can be implemented instead. One idea for future work is to explore the path to extend OGC API Features with encodings as bounding volume hierarchies.
8 Requirements classes for encodings
8.1. Overview
This clause specifies four pre-defined requirements classes for encodings to be used by a OGC API Features implementation. These encodings are commonly used encodings for spatial data on the web:
HTML
GeoJSON
Geography Markup Language (GML), Simple Features Profile, Level 0
Geography Markup Language (GML), Simple Features Profile, Level 2
None of these encodings are mandatory and an implementation of the Core requirements class may also implement none of them but implement another encoding instead.
one limitation of OGC API Features is the supported encodings that are not suited for 3D. However, at the 3DPS SWG meeting last week, Josh pointed out that one of the encodings is mandatory and other encodings can be implemented instead. One idea for future work is to explore the path to extend OGC API Features with encodings as bounding volume hierarchies.
http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/17-069r3/17-069r3.html
8 Requirements classes for encodings 8.1. Overview This clause specifies four pre-defined requirements classes for encodings to be used by a OGC API Features implementation. These encodings are commonly used encodings for spatial data on the web:
HTML GeoJSON Geography Markup Language (GML), Simple Features Profile, Level 0 Geography Markup Language (GML), Simple Features Profile, Level 2
None of these encodings are mandatory and an implementation of the Core requirements class may also implement none of them but implement another encoding instead.