Closed dstenger closed 7 years ago
Multi-file payloads are explained in chapter 9.3.3 of the WCS 1.0.0 specification [1]:
Several well-known coverage formats encode data and metadata into multiple files. When returning a multi-file payload to the client, WCS 1.0.0 servers should use multi- part MIME encoding [IETF RFC 2045].
NOTE A multi-part MIME bundle provides no guidance to clients as to the role of each file: the cli- ent must be able to recognize each piece by its MIME type or suggested filename. Other methods for bundling files exist, such as SOAP XML messages with binary attachments; but these will require additional consensus across the OGC suite of specifications.
The explanation are also part of the start page of the ETS. The user can enter a comma separated list of file formats (by default image/tif). If the list is empty the test should not be executed.
Does this definition resolve the problem? If there are still any open questions, please reopen this issue.
Can you please elaborate what does this test case stands for or what does multifile_payload mean? Is this test case optional?
Test service: http://122.15.218.129:8081/OGC_WCS/OGCReqResDispatcher?service=wcs&request=GetCapabilities&version=1.0.0