Closed greatzzk closed 11 months ago
Thank you for reporting.
I agree that your assumption might be correct. Is it possible for you to change one of the CRS so that the same one is used to verify that?
@dstenger just to share some info that i feel important: i read the specification and it says "the footprint is always given in WGS84". so i feel it will be good to convert the boundedby envelope to 4326 all the time before comparison.
I agree to your observation.
Thus, the test suite should transform the used coordinate reference systems and I label this issue as a bug. Just out of interest, did you check if changing the CRS resolved the error (of course, this is still a bug in the test suites which must be resolved by the CITE developer team)?
@bpross-52n Please use jts version 1.13 (reference: https://github.com/opengeospatial/teamengine-bom/blob/main/pom.xml) for the fix.
@bpross-52n @dstenger can we merge the PR so that we can test the updated te2? I still see it fails there
We are currently working on other ets-wcs20 issues. As soon as we are finished, we will merge all pull requests and install a new revision of the test suite on Beta. This is planned for late August/ September.
I verified on te2 against my server, cheers!!
the test fails and my server has:
the test is for checking: https://cite.opengeospatial.org/te2/listings/te_base_scripts_wcs_2.0.1_ctl_eowcs_EO-data-model.html#wcseo:req6 all polygons listed in eop:EarthObservation/om:featureOfInterest/eop:Footprint element shall be contained in the bounding box of the gml:boundedBy element of the gml:Envelope
note: the spatial references are different. I suspect the test didn't perform reprojection before comparing?