Direct WFS 2.0 Test - Spatial and Temporal Filter

Dnoack49 commented 2 years ago

Dear community,

This issue includes the description of error-messages concerning the Spatial and Temporal Filter Conformance Classes.

Temporal Filter While validating this WFS (INSPIRE Annex Theme "Planned Land Use") using both, the productive instance as well as the staging instance we receive the following errors for the Temporal Filter conformance class

grafik

According to the issue NullPointerExceptions for several WFS tests #199 which described the same problem, the error has been fixed . As this is not the case for our implementation, we ask for adivce.

Spatial Filter For the same WFS the test step 'invalid Geometry Operand' results in an error when using the staging instance: grafik

Yet, it does not when carrying out the test with the production instance (I think this should be correct, as the Featuretype OfficialDocumentation has no Geomety-Attribute): grafik

Test reports: WFS-PLU-BKT_staginginstance.pdf WFS-PLU-BKT_productioninstance.pdf

Thank you.

dstenger commented 2 years ago

Thank you for reporting. Unfortunately, we currently cannot reproduce your problem as the provided service is not reachable. Can you please bring the service back online so that we can check why the tests are failing?

Dnoack49 commented 2 years ago

Indeed we had an internal problem and the service was down. It is up again for you to check.

dstenger commented 2 years ago

Regarding Temporal Filter, it seems that the same fix as implemented in https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-wfs20/issues/199 has to be applied for test before Period.

Regarding Spatial Filter, following request

POST https://inspire.brandenburg.de/services/plu_bkt_jaenschwalde_wfs

<wfs:GetFeature xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs/2.0" count="10" service="WFS"
            version="2.0.0">
<wfs:Query xmlns:ns39="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/plu/4.0"
          typeNames="ns39:OfficialDocumentation"/>
</wfs:GetFeature>

returns a feature without geometry. This might be the root cause of the problem.

@bpross-52n Can you please take a closer look at the reported problems?

mlcharv commented 1 year ago

Hi, We think we ran into this problem when validating this WFS, as explained in this issue: INSPIRE-MIF/helpdesk-validator#831 Just wanted to check if any progress has been made Thank you!

bpross-52n commented 1 year ago

Regarding Temporal Filter, this will be fixed with https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-wfs20/pull/241

Regarding Spatial Filter, this will be fixed with https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-wfs20/pull/237

opengeospatial / ets-wfs20

Direct WFS 2.0 Test - Spatial and Temporal Filter #226