search

opengeospatial / geopackage-related-tables

A proposed GeoPackage extension for related tables
Other
3 stars 6 forks source link

Update REQ006.adoc #47

Closed bradh closed 6 years ago

bradh commented 6 years ago

This makes req 5 and 6 symmetric, and changes the wording for new req 6A to reflect the heading at 6.1.4 (related data, not attributes).

Yes, we need to renumber, again.

bradh commented 6 years ago

On second thoughts, maybe we don't want 6A at all, because that would mean the experimental (i.e. x-_) would be non-compliant. In fact, we say

There are no explicit requirements for a generic user-defined related data table

in http://www.geopackage.org/18-000.html#user_defined_related_data_table so that would lean to just changing it to be consistent with Req 5.

jyutzler commented 6 years ago

:+1: on updating R6 to mirror R5, :-1: on adding a new requirement. The presence of the user-defined table is already implied by R6 because http://www.geopackage.org/spec/#r14 already mandates the presence of an actual table (or view).

I will update accordingly.