Please find the following comments in response to the call for the Public Comment on the NetCDF-LD Candidate Standard.
PART A
Evaluator:
[Peng Yue]
Submission: [19-002, OGC Encoding Linked Data Graphs in NetCDF Files]
PART B
Requirement: [General, #]
Implementation Specification Section number: [General, #6.4]
Is it possilbe for the RDF Vocabularies to consider geo data cube practices?
Criticality: [Major, Minor, Editorial, etc.]
Minor
Comments/justifications for changes: [Comments]
When defining standards such as NetCDF-LD and possible future work on HDF5-LD, GeoTIFF-LD, can we consider geo data cube vocabulary by consolidating practices in [1-4]? NetCDF4/HDF5 files was used in the open data cube before. In this way richer semantics can be involved in data provision.
Dear NetCDF-LD Editors,
Please find the following comments in response to the call for the Public Comment on the NetCDF-LD Candidate Standard.
PART A
Evaluator: [Peng Yue]
Submission: [19-002, OGC Encoding Linked Data Graphs in NetCDF Files]
PART B
Requirement: [General, #]
Implementation Specification Section number: [General, #6.4] Is it possilbe for the RDF Vocabularies to consider geo data cube practices?
Criticality: [Major, Minor, Editorial, etc.] Minor
Comments/justifications for changes: [Comments] When defining standards such as NetCDF-LD and possible future work on HDF5-LD, GeoTIFF-LD, can we consider geo data cube vocabulary by consolidating practices in [1-4]? NetCDF4/HDF5 files was used in the open data cube before. In this way richer semantics can be involved in data provision.
[1] OGC Testbed 17: Geo Data Cube API Engineering Report: http://docs.opengeospatial.org/per/21-027.html [2] The RDF Data Cube Vocabulary: https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ [3] QB4ST: RDF Data Cube extensions for spatio-temporal components (OGC 16-142): https://www.w3.org/TR/qb4st/ [4] Publishing and Using Earth Observation Data with the RDF Data Cube and the Discrete Global Grid System: https://www.w3.org/TR/eo-qb/
All the best,
Peng