search

opengeospatial / ogc-geosparql

Public Repository for the OGC GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group
78 stars 20 forks source link

Reaffirm original Submitting organizations, add new #100

Closed nicholascar closed 2 years ago

nicholascar commented 3 years ago

The original "Submitting organizations" for GeoSPARQL were:

a) Australian Bureau of Meteorology b) Bentley Systems, Inc. c) CSIRO d) Defence Geospatial Information Working Group (DGIWG) e) GeoConnections - Natural Resources Canada f) Interactive Instruments GmbH g) Oracle America h) Ordnance Survey i) Raytheon Company j) Traverse Technologies, Inc. k) US Geological Survey (USGS)

These are not necessarily the same as implementers.

We need to reaffirm their interest/connection to GeoSAPRQL.

Here is my best guess for contacts:

Organization Person
Australian Bureau of Meteorology ?
Bentley Systems, Inc. ?
CSIRO @dr-shorthair
DGIWG ?
GeoConnections - Natural Resources Canada Ryan Ahola
Interactive Instruments GmbH ?
Mainz University Of Applied Sciences @situx
Oracle America @mperry455
Ordnance Survey ?
Raytheon Company ?
Traverse Technologies, Inc. ? - ask Josh Lieberman
US Geological Survey (USGS) ? Dalia

New submitting orgs could be:

l) SURROUND Australia Pty Ltd. m) Mainz University Of Applied Sciences n) Geoscape Australia o) Geonovum p) ...

dvaranka commented 3 years ago

I am not sure how to reply to the message below, as I am an observer of the discussion. At the USGS, we tested triplestores supporting GeoSPARQL but ended up writing our own GeoSPARQL support software due to storage needs and to determine relations between polygons and lines. I was/am the primary contact person at the USGS.

From: Nicholas Car notifications@github.com Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:24 AM To: opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql ogc-geosparql@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] [opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql] Reaffirm original Submitting organizations, add new (#100)

This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.

The original "Submitting organizations" for GeoSPARQL were:

a) Australian Bureau of Meteorology b) Bentley Systems, Inc. c) CSIRO d) Defence Geospatial Information Working Group (DGIWG) e) GeoConnections - Natural Resources Canada f) Interactive Instruments GmbH g) Oracle America h) Ordnance Survey i) Raytheon Company j) Traverse Technologies, Inc. k) US Geological Survey (USGS)

These are not necessarily the same as implementers.

We need to reaffirm their interest/connection to GeoSAPRQL.

Here is my best guess for contacts:

Organization Person Australian Bureau of Meteorology ? Bentley Systems, Inc. ? CSIRO @dr-shorthairhttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdr-shorthair&data=04%7C01%7Cdvaranka%40usgs.gov%7C099f153c4cb74f7762ff08d8dd4c38a4%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637502666726716023%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Q29J%2B7P46NE9wFyTOHFPyUTGk0%2B1Pa%2BCYy1u68qojEc%3D&reserved=0 DGIWG ? GeoConnections - Natural Resources Canada ? Boyan Brodaric contacted for info Interactive Instruments GmbH ? Oracle America @mperry455https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmperry455&data=04%7C01%7Cdvaranka%40usgs.gov%7C099f153c4cb74f7762ff08d8dd4c38a4%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637502666726716023%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=GYl%2BFxYj939Iti6WUDVPoMl%2BEgTlR%2FsO8RcPkgUtUOY%3D&reserved=0 Ordnance Survey ? Raytheon Company ? Traverse Technologies, Inc. ? US Geological Survey (USGS) ? contacted

New submitting orgs could be:

l) SURROUND Australia Pty Ltd. m) Mainz University Of Applied Sciences n) GeoScape Australia o) ...

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopengeospatial%2Fogc-geosparql%2Fissues%2F100&data=04%7C01%7Cdvaranka%40usgs.gov%7C099f153c4cb74f7762ff08d8dd4c38a4%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637502666726725984%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VDQU23py0Ki7UFVxU3xQX%2BeHNwqsprV9rzvNIAVF7vs%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAEWS3RAE3MK5Q3DKRDCBYRDTBSHCDANCNFSM4YOJ3XKA&data=04%7C01%7Cdvaranka%40usgs.gov%7C099f153c4cb74f7762ff08d8dd4c38a4%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637502666726725984%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=U2nHXM2ymn8FJjVV9sDTwOMKERaEwjbOjhfiQon8uWs%3D&reserved=0.

nicholascar commented 3 years ago

Thanks @dvaranka, you being in contact like this is just fine. Shortly we'll have a first full draft of GeoSPARQL 1.1 ready for external review. At that point we'll contact original supporter organizations via their contact people, such as yourself, to ensure you're all aware of the new version and supply any feedback.

As you know, we are contacting GeoSPARQL implementers separately (see Issue #59) and we will tabulate implementations of 1.0 and 1.1 soon too. It sounds as though USGS is a unilateral GeoSPARQL implementer though! Can you supply any more info on your "own GeoSPARQL support software"? Is it available? If not, can you at least describe the implementation for our implementations table?

jabhay commented 2 years ago

@ogcscotts : what is the usual process that OGC goes through wrt original Submitting Organisations when a standard is updated? Should we be reaching out to contacts within the organisations to see if they want to remain SOs or removed from the list?

nicholascar commented 2 years ago

This list should appear for 1.1 below the list for 1.0 which should be retained.