Open wouterbeek opened 4 months ago
Thanks, @wouterbeek. I think this is a great idea. We will discuss it in the next meeting and get back to you in this issue.
Based on 02/21/24 meeting discussion, the consensus is that it is a good idea to add a transform function with default CRS84 target, but this will be a 1.3 feature rather than 1.1.
Hi GeoSPARQL friends!,
It is great that GeoSPARQL 1.1 will include function [1].
Since transformations to CRS [2] are particularly common, would it make sense to make the second argument to function [1] optional? If the CRS is absent, CRS [2] is used by default.
This is consistent with [2] already being the default CRS in WKT literals.