Open VladimirAlexiev opened 4 months ago
As discussed in 03/06/2024 SWG meeting, we have purposely omitted an rdfs:range for geo:hasSpatialResolution to avoid overly restricting to a specific units of measure vocabulary and simply recommend a unit of measure vocabulary for geo:hasSpatialResolution as we do for other properties in the spec. geo:hasMetricSpatialResolution has rdfs:range xsd:double because it is defined specifically to be in Meters.
@mperry455
to avoid overly restricting to a specific units of measure vocabulary
Keeping the choice of UoM open is fine.
However, I'm arguing to fix what are the outgoing props (your examples use qudt:numericValue, qudt:unit
).
If you don't do that, the user cannot query hasSpatialResolution
because he would have no idea what follows.
10.7.4. Property:
geo:hasSpatialResolution
https://docs.ogc.org/is/22-047r1/22-047r1.html#10-7-4-%C2%A0-property-geo-hasspatialresolution doesn't define a range for that prop, and there is none ingeo.ttl
.There is a link to https://docs.ogc.org/is/22-047r1/22-047r1.html#_recommendation_for_units_of_measure, which gives it as an example and refers to QUDT, but doesn't specify the exact properties to use.
https://docs.ogc.org/is/22-047r1/22-047r1.html#c-1-2-2-%C2%A0-feature-properties and https://docs.ogc.org/is/22-047r1/22-047r1.html#c-1-2-3-%C2%A0-geometry-properties give examples of using that with specific props:
These two props don't have a defined domain in http://qudt.org/2.1/schema/qudt. However, http://qudt.org/vocab/constant/ uses them with a domain (class)
qudt:ConstantValue
. I think the question "Is spatial accuracy a constant value?" can be answered affirmatively. Alternatively, you could define a classgeo:NumericValue
to host these 2 props.I understand that "recommendation_for_units_of_measure" only suggests but doesn't mandate QUDT units. However, I think it is to the spec's benefit to fix which props are used with
hasSpatialResolution
. Otherwise users would not know what data to put at the end ofhasSpatialResolution