opengeospatial / ogc-modspec

OGC ModSpec in Metanorma
1 stars 2 forks source link

Use of concept "permission" in the ModSpec #34

Closed cnreediii closed 1 week ago

cnreediii commented 3 months ago

The OAB recommended adding words to the ModSpec stating that a permissions cannot override a requirement. Note by CR: Also need more informative wording for "permission" and also need to add "permission" to T&Ds.

dr-shorthair commented 2 months ago

This also needs to be aligned with the 'normative terms' definitions. i.e. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119 (IETF) or https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/part2/index.xhtml#_idTextAnchor078 (ISO)

cnreediii commented 2 months ago

Agreed. Reading the ISO directives, I think the use of "permission" in OGC standards is inconsistent (and perhaps also in the ModSpec!).

cnreediii commented 2 months ago

From August 23, 2024 meeting: Defer any final decision until a later date. First decision is whether "Permission" will be a concept in the ModSpec revision. If the answer is yes, then the recommendation is to use the IDO definition. Based on the conversation, if we keep the permission concept, then a permission must be associated with a requirement.