Open cportele opened 2 years ago
Outcome of discussion at session in 127th members meeting in Singapore: For the i3s BVH, we can use what Esri already uses which is:
application/vnd.esri.i3s.json+gzip
where the JSON files are also always pre-gzip-compressed. Esri or OGC should register this media type with IANA.
For 3D Tiles, the correct order would have been application/3dtiles+json
, rather than the other way around. However, the 3D Tiles spec currently explicitly states that application/json
should be used.
@lilleyse would Cesium like to register application/3dtiles+json
and update this in a later version of the spec, in which case in OGC API - 3D GeoVolumes we could adopt this option (I think this would be preferable from an OGC perspective, to avoid confusion with other potential JSON BVH), or should we just stick to the generic application/json
currently mandated in the spec (given that i3s would now use a different media type to differentiate it)? Thanks.
Action: Update i3s media type in draft to application/vnd.esri.i3s.json+gzip
Action: OGC or Esri to register application/vnd.esri.i3s.json+gzip
with IANA
Action: Update 3D Tiles media type in draft to application/json
or application/3dtiles+json
based on feedback from Cesium
Action?: OGC or Cesium to register application/3dtiles+json
with IANA
We plan on registering media types for various file formats in 3D Tiles, but it likely won't happen until the next spec revision. application/3dtiles+json
seems like the right choice in the future but for now I would stick with application/json
.
The current rules for media types have at least two problems:
tileset files use ... the application/json media type.
Use the correct, registered media types for the different formats.