opengeospatial / ogcapi-coverages

OGC API - Coverages draft specification
https://ogcapi.ogc.org/coverages
Apache License 2.0
22 stars 13 forks source link

Reference definition of Sensor Model from ISO 19130-3:2022 #177

Closed ghobona closed 6 days ago

ghobona commented 8 months ago

ISO 19130-3:2022 offers a definition of 'sensor model' that could be referenced by OGC API - Coverages.

Currently OGC API - Coverages offers its own definition in Clause 4.8.

jerstlouis commented 6 months ago

Suggesting to change the Sensor Model definition to the ISO 19130-3:2022 definition:

mathematical description of the relationship between the three-dimensional object space and the 2D plane of the associated image (3.2) produced by a sensor (3.5)

cc. @alexrobin @cmheazel is that OK?

alexrobin commented 6 months ago

I like the fact that the definition from ISO19130 is more formal than the one currently in the document.

Unfortunately, the reference to a "2D plane of the associated image" makes it specific to imaging sensors, which is somewhat restrictive for coverages in general... I think you might want to associate other types of sensor models to coverages, such as the ones of LiDAR, profilers, etc...

jerstlouis commented 6 months ago

@alexrobin Definitely.

@ghobona Alex has a great point, this 2D plane is way too restrictive, so that is a good justification for not using the ISO definition. That might be why Chuck had used this alternate definition.

How about:

mathematical description of the relationship between the three-dimensional object space and the corresponding dimensions of the associated coverage produced by a sensor (3.5).

alexrobin commented 6 months ago

@jerstlouis I like your definition, although I wonder if we should be more specific and call it the "geometric sensor model", as there are other aspects of a sensor model such as the "radiometric model", or more generally the "response model", which is linked to the range of the coverage.

jerstlouis commented 6 days ago

The changes have been applied and no further feedback was received so so closing this issue.