Closed ycespb closed 1 year ago
Related to #283, I guess.
Actually, all the conformance URIs referenced in the permission should be references to requirements. I should also update the URI to be /req/searchable-catalogue/requirements
rather than /req/searchable-catalogue/conformance
. These requirement URIs are not meant to be listed in the /conformance
declaration; those are actually listed here.
The specification uses a requirements class URI for cql-filter ( http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-records-1/1.0/req/cql-filter) while other capabilities are identified by their conformance class (e.g. in https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/20-004.html#_core). Should there not be a corresponding "conformance class" URI and should the conformance class URI /conf/ be listed in the /conformance response or should the /req/ URI be included in the /conformance response or none of the two ? The same /req/ URI is borrowed by STAC where it is used as "conformance class". See also https://github.com/stac-api-extensions/collection-search/issues/9 .