Closed cportele closed 2 years ago
@jeffharrison @jerstlouis @skynacho @ayoumans
This PR updates both specifications based on the open issues and the decision in the last SWG meeting. I have also added test suites to both specifications to verify that requirements are testable.
I have also added all of you and your organisations as submitters. Please let me know, if this is incorrect.
Please review the PR - thank you in advance.
@ayoumans - I don't think the changes affect extensibility.
Extensions will need to specify how clients can trigger the extended capabilities (e.g., request a different route representation or just part of the route), but it does not really matter, if it is a new requirements class in the same standard or in another document.
The changes look excellent. Thanks very much for your help and hard work on this. Think we're ready for the next step ...
Thanks and Regards, Jeff
closes #2 closes #3 closes #21 closes #29 closes #35 closes #36 closes #38 closes #40 closes #41 closes #42 closes #43
In addition, test suites have been added to both specifications. Some of the normative statements have been changed so that all requirements are testable.