opengeospatial / om-swg

10 stars 6 forks source link

Abstraction Requirements Glitch #106

Closed KathiSchleidt closed 3 months ago

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: DK-036 Clause/Subclause: 8.3.2 Paragraph/Figure/Table: Req Type of comment: Ed Comments: In the requirement it is stated that “the feature of interest that may….”. According to the ISO Directive Part 2 table 3 the word may should be a shall. Proposed change: Change the wording to “An observable quality (property, characteristic) of the feature of interest that shall be observed”


MB/NC: DK-038 Clause/Subclause: 8.6.2 Paragraph/Figure/Table: Req Type of comment: Ed Comments: In the requirement it is stated that “…entity that may generate….”. According to the ISO Directive Part 2 table 3 the word may should be a shall. Proposed change: Change the wording to “An identifiable entity that shall generate Observations pertaining to an observableProperty by implementing a Procedure

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: DK-036 Requirement /req/obs-cpt/ObservableProperty/ObservableProperty-sem: An observable quality (property, characteristic) of the feature of interest that may be observed.

MB/NC: DK-038 Requirement /req/obs-cpt/Observer/Observer-sem | An identifiable entity that may generate Observations pertaining to an observableProperty by implementing a Procedure.

Proposal: change may to can, takes us out of the normative triggers

dr-shorthair commented 3 years ago

Take care to align terminology with ISO 19109

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

need to check again in light of today's Characteristics discussion on Semantics of "phenomenon" #101

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

checked, is good

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

"may" changed to "can" in: