Unclear Quotes

[KathiSchleidt]

-039 the “world in the vicinity of the observer/sampler Is this a direct quotation from another source? If so, please provide the Bibliographical reference for it. Pertains to 7.2.3

Interesting is that they didn't catch a parallel formulation under 13.3.2 Feature type SpatialSample

• Typically an Observation ‘site’ or 'station' connotes the 'world in the vicinity of the site (or station)', ...

[KathiSchleidt]

-080 (although ‘specimen preservation could be considered a specific activity per se’) The inverted commas here imply that this text has been quoted from another source. Please provide the SOURCE reference for this quotation and ensure that all necessary permissions have been obtained concerning its reproduction. Alternatively, please delete or rephrase.

[sgrellet]

• 039 the “world in the vicinity of the observer/sampler : agreed with KS but if we follow that brain path where do we stop the logic ? still in 7.2.3 we also wrote : In various countries/domains, terms like “site” and station” are encountered. it's obvious (I guess) that's not a quote from some source. -> what's the ISO rule around this ?

• -080 (although ‘specimen preservation could be considered a specific activity per se’) I don't remember this being the quote of some source. Re-reading the sentence I think the quotes are misplaced. It should have been written (although ‘specimen preservation' could be considered a specific activity per se); -> this brings the same question as above regarding the ISO rule on that point -> are we allowed to put in quote terms to give an example without this being considered a quote of some source ?

[KathiSchleidt]

• 039: I think we can leave the "" out as the logical grouping is clear from the text
• 080: also don't understand why we even have quotes here, wrong

on individual quoted words, I've found a place where Alison put such quotes in (see NOTE 2 under 8.4.2 Interface Procedure), so we're definitely good there.