search

opengeospatial / om-swg

10 stars 6 forks source link

Bibliography #198

Closed KathiSchleidt closed 3 weeks ago

KathiSchleidt commented 2 years ago

-102 [32] https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ Please complete this Bibliographical entry.

-103 [2] ISO 19105:2000, Geographic information — Conformance and testing [3] ISO/DIS 19105, Geographic information — Conformance and testing Is it necessary to cite both of these documents in the Bibliography? Neither seem to be cited in the document. Consider removing.

-104 Bibliography Note that references only need to be dated if they refer to a specific part of a document (e.g. specific subclause, table, etc.)

ilkkarinne commented 2 years ago

Reference to 19105 was added to the Bibliography based on the CD Ballot comment requesting it (see #92). It is not used in the text, so I would be fine to remove both versions of it ([2] ISO 19105:2000 and [3] ISO/DIS 19105) from the Bibliography

ilkkarinne commented 2 years ago

Ok, took a bit of detective work to figure out the first comment: We did not have a bib. entry 32 in the submitted DIS version. We used the link to https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ in the Introduction, which was replaced by Alison with a reference to a new bib. entry [32] (also created as incomplete by Alison?).

Proposal: complete the new bib. entry 32 as follows:

[32] Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices, W3C Working Group Note, 28 September 2017. Also published as OGC Best Practice 15-107, https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/

KathiSchleidt commented 2 years ago

-102 [32] https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ Take version proposed by Ilkka

-103 [2] ISO 19105:2000, Geographic information — Conformance and testing Remove from Bib as not cited in doc

-104 Bibliography I'm for leaving the dates as they stand, as different versions of ISO standards tend to have quite different content

ilkkarinne commented 2 years ago

@KathiSchleidt: what about [3] ISO/DIS 19105? Should we keep it?

-104: The ISO House Style states that the references to numbered documents are to be provided undated unless it is "necessary that the user refers to a specific edition" (https://www.iso.org/ISO-house-style.html#iso-hs-s-text-r-r-ref_numbered). So keeping them "just in case" would seem to be in conflict with the this style guide.

KathiSchleidt commented 2 years ago

not sure why that was in there twice, all for removing both!!!