Corrections on Definitions

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: TMG-015 Clause/Subclause: 3.2 Paragraph/Figure/Table: coverage Type of comment: ed Comments: the format of the source reference will need to be changed if there were changes in 19123-1 Proposed change: please confirm this entry in 19123-1 prior to the next project stage;

MB/NC: TMG-016 Clause/Subclause: 3.4 Paragraph/Figure/Table: domain Type of comment: ed Comments: the authoritative source reference is lacking the terminology entry number; the draft note does not match the note of the authoritative source reference Proposed change: use the note to entry from the authoritative source reference; if the PT wishes to keep the revised note, the source reference needs to be corrected, as shown below: [SOURCE: ISO 19109:2015, 4.8, modified — The original Note 1 to entry has been removed and a new Note 1 to entry has been added.

MB/NC: TMG-018 Clause/Subclause: 3.6 Paragraph/Figure/Table: ex-situ Type of comment: Comments: the definition is slightly different at the end adding "off-site" which is not in the authoritative source entry; consider revision to match or keep as new definition Proposed change: consider using the following modification:3.6ex-situoff sitereferring to the study, maintenance or conservation of a specimen or population away from its natural surroundingsNote 1 to entry: Opposite of in-situ (on site).

MB/NC: TMG-019 Clause/Subclause: 3.7 Paragraph/Figure/Table: feature Type of comment: ed Comments: the Note 1 to entry is different than the Note 1 to entry of the authoritative source; Proposed change: revise the terminology entry as follows:

3.7
**feature**
abstraction of real-world phenomena
Note 1 to entry: A feature may occur as a type or an instance. In this document, feature instance is meant unless otherwise specified.
[ISO 19101-1:2014, definition 4.1.11, modified —  Note 1 to entry has been modified.]

MB/NC: TMG-020 Clause/Subclause: 3.9 Paragraph/Figure/Table: measure Type of comment: ed Comments: the domain is missing from the definition; ISO 19136-1 assigns the domain to this definition; the Note 1 to entry (from 19136-1) is missing; the authoritative source reference should be ISO 19136-1:2020 3.1.41 Proposed change: if the candidate entry is not specific to GML then either the definition should be modified, and/or a new domain should be used, or the note to entry should be modified; aligning with the terminology entry defined by the source reference, the corrected terminology entry should be:

**3.1.41**
**measure**
<GML> value described using a numeric amount with a scale or using a scalar reference system
Note 1 to entry: When used as a noun, measure is a synonym for physical quantity.
[SOURCE: ISO 19136-1:2020 3.1.41]

MB/NC: TMG-021 Clause/Subclause: 3.10 Paragraph/Figure/Table: measurement Type of comment: ed Comments: the authoritative source is incorrect; the authoritative source reference is: ISO 19101-2:2018, 3.21; ISO 19101-2:2018 references the VIM as the source for the entry; the revision of ISO 19101-2 change from TS to IS Proposed change: the authoritative source reference is: [SOURCE: ISO 19101-2:2018, 3.21]

MB/NC: TMG-022 Clause/Subclause: 3.11 Paragraph/Figure/Table: measurand Type of comment: ed Comments: the draft definition is different from the authoritative source definition which is the first edition of this standard (IS0 19156:2011);the term is only used 1 time in the document (outside of clause 3) in Table B.2; ISO/CS may require the term be used in the body of the document – please consider this; Proposed change: use the original definition from ISO 19156:2011; ISO 19136-1:2020 also contains this terminology entry but with the note removed and a different source; if you want to use the VIM as the source reference, consider this option: [SOURCE: VIM3:2012, 2.3]

MB/NC: TMG-024 Clause/Subclause: 3.12 Paragraph/Figure/Table: property Type of comment: ed Comments: the definition here and also from ISO 19156:2011 modified the source entry by adding a note which was not indicated correctly in the source reference Proposed change: please use the following source reference: [SOURCE: ISO 19143:2010, 4.21, modified — Example has been added to the entry.]

MB/NC: TMG-025 Clause/Subclause: 3.13 Paragraph/Figure/Table: property type Type of comment: ed Comments: The example should appear before the Notes to entry Proposed change: Move the Example after the definition

MB/NC: TMG-026 Clause/Subclause: 3.14 Paragraph/Figure/Table: range Type of comment: ed Comments: the domain is missing from the definition; check the definition in the reference source Proposed change: please add the domain ;please confirm this entry in 19123-1 prior to the next project stage;

MB/NC: TMG-027 Clause/Subclause: 3.15 Paragraph/Figure/Table: value Type of comment: ed Comments: check the source reference;it appears that Notes to entry have been added; Proposed change:

**3.15**
**value**
element of a type domain
Note 1 to entry: A value considers a possible state of an object within a class or type (domain).
Note 2 to entry: A data value is an instance of a datatype, a value without identity.
Note 3 to entry: A value can use one of a variety of scales including nominal, ordinal, ratio and interval, spatial and temporal. Primitive datatypes can be combined to form aggregate datatypes with aggregate values, including vectors, tensors and images.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 19501:2005, 0000_5, modified — Notes to entry have been added.]

MB/NC: TMG-028 Clause/Subclause: 3.16 Paragraph/Figure/Table: requirement Type of comment: ed Comments: check the source reference of the entry; Proposed change: while it is possible to use the ISO/IEC directives as the source, other more suitable terminology entries exist; check the OBP for alternatives

MB/NC: TMG-029 Clause/Subclause: 3.17 Paragraph/Figure/Table: recommendation Type of comment: ed Comments: check the source reference of the entry; Proposed change: while it is possible to use the ISO/IEC directives as the source, other more suitable terminology entries exist; check the OBP for alternatives

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

Cross check with GeoLexica

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: TMG-027 In order to add additional notes to definitions, is it valid to provide these after the reference to the source. If not, how can we add additional notes to make our definitions more precise than the original source?

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: TMG-028 & MB/NC: TMG-029 As we cannot identify a clear target for requirement and recommendation, and these terms are not defined within other ISO standards, we propose deleting them from the terms and definitions

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: TMG-[15-26] Modifications will be made in accordance with ISO requirements towards definition format as recommended

KathiSchleidt commented 3 years ago

MB/NC: TMG-028 & MB/NC: TMG-029 Fixed