Version 1.1 does not have much structure in its requirements classes. Also, all requirements classes have "Web Service" as target, even the data model and MQTT classes.
For version 2.0 a more structured approach may be useful. A first attempt is:
We can discuss which classes depend on which other classes, and how to set the types (Core / Extension / Optional?).
Version 1.1 does not have much structure in its requirements classes. Also, all requirements classes have "Web Service" as target, even the data model and MQTT classes.
For version 2.0 a more structured approach may be useful. A first attempt is:
We can discuss which classes depend on which other classes, and how to set the types (Core / Extension / Optional?).