Closed saroele closed 8 years ago
Looks great! What do you propose: merge #111 and drop #109 and #110 ?
Yes. As I it contains all your commits, I think that merging that pr will close the others. Op 25 feb. 2016 23:35 schreef "Jan Pecinovsky" notifications@github.com:
Looks great! What do you propose: merge #111 https://github.com/opengridcc/opengrid/pull/111 and drop #109 https://github.com/opengridcc/opengrid/pull/109 and #110 https://github.com/opengridcc/opengrid/pull/110 ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/opengridcc/opengrid/pull/111#issuecomment-189014704.
@saroele Sounds good! I'll look into it this afternoon
I wanted to add this commit to the pull request #110 but I did it wrong and it became a separate PR.
@JrtPec , I didn't change anything fundamental. Main changes are a separate
do_analysis()
method that gives more flexibility and a unittest. I adapted the notebooks demo_cache and electricity_standby to the new framework.(@Ryton ) The notebook Electricity_standby.ipynb contains a function to filter out the submeters. If this function is fine, we should move it to the library. Atm, the function prints out a lot of debug info, so you can see which sensors are removed.