Closed klaernie closed 6 years ago
Hi Andre,
Thanks for reporting this, I was unaware that the testing repo still did not contain the latest stable release. You'll be pleased to know that as of #62 stable NEW stable releases will be incorporated in the testing and unstable repos as you expect.
2.0.0-RC1 is actually pretty old, as there was no testing/RC phase before the release of 2.1.0. There are a couple of breaking changes between it and 2.1.0 as well. Therefore, I would be keen to add a 2.1.0 version to it as soon as possible. I'm currently unsure the best way to go about this.
@ThomDietrich, @kaikreuzer, @theoweiss. I'm thinking of adding a 2.1.0-2 version that belongs to the testing distribution only. Here I would:
Why 2.1.0-2? Because the Linux package would include tools not seen in 2.1.0-1 but are linuxpkg specific, such as the new openhab-cli. Otherwise the actual distribution of 2.1.0 will be identical.
Another option would be to publish 2.1.0-2 in stable and testing, but not in unstable.
Kind Regards, Ben
Hi @klaernie, I have added a PR which will help me resolve the issue. I hope to test it and then implement it by the end of tomorrow.
Hi @klaernie, the testing repo now contains version 2.1.0-2. Which is the 2.1.0 distribution plus the latest apt package fixes.
Hi @BClark09, sorry for the late reply. Thanks a lot, works nicely!
Hi there,
I installed openHAB for the first time and decided to go for testing packages, as they promise a trade off between freshness and stability. Two days later I noticed that openhab.org offers downloads for version 2.1 where I had 2.0.0-RC1 installed.
My expectation was, that the versions in the repositories always fulfill
unstable >= testing >= stable
. If this promise is not fulfilled the documentation should state that testing and stable repositories should be active at the same time (the only other possibility interpreting the docs).Thanks and kind regards, Andre
(Follow-up to openhab/openhab-distro#545)