In the handshake rules, we have the following note:
The ready signals is allowed to be 1 when the corresponding valid signal is not asserted
What about the opposite configuration ? I guess that a valid followed by a ready is the nominal use case when the coprocessor is busy, but this is not written explicitly.
Proposed Resolution
I think an additional note would be useful to explain clearly how to deal with the "coprocessor busy" scenario.
Comment
In the handshake rules, we have the following note:
What about the opposite configuration ? I guess that a valid followed by a ready is the nominal use case when the coprocessor is busy, but this is not written explicitly.
Proposed Resolution
I think an additional note would be useful to explain clearly how to deal with the "coprocessor busy" scenario.
Addition Info
No response