search

openid / Contract-Exchange-Extension

The (draft) OpenID Contract Exchange Extension specification.
6 stars 3 forks source link

Disclosure should be always public ? #3

Closed hdknr closed 13 years ago

hdknr commented 14 years ago

In the case of payment:

  1. End User buys somehting at RP
  2. RP proposes CX contract to OP
  3. End User visits OP with the artifact of the contract.
  4. End User authenticates and browses the detail of the contract before he/she pays.

If the contract binds all there party, the consideration between RP and OP SHOULD be shown to the End User. For example, because 7 $ ,7% commission of total amount of 100$ payment from the End User to RP thought OP MUST be dedicated by OP, RP will be paid 93$ by OP.

Is it right ? For usual credit card payment in Internet, we usually don't know about commission between the net shop and the payment agency.

This seems to be important to define of the OP and CX Template for the contract.

sakimura commented 14 years ago

Hmmm. It may involve some IP so let us do it in the specs-cx ML first, as that is the only formal way of doing it right now. Besides, others who has not been looking at this message may also be interested in the topic.

hdknr commented 14 years ago

I got it. I'll post there after thinking more.