Open Sakurann opened 1 month ago
discussed in a WG.
vp_query
, but we should bikeshed.
presentation_definition
is a... um... silly name at best so no need to keep that
I agree that the new query language should use its own parameter names.
I prefer a top level parameter called something like "query-language" and then beneath this there will be the query languages that we support - currently only two, but who knows what else in future? Remember that until a few months ago we only mandated one query language, now we support two. This proposed structure is future proof so that if we want to add a third in future the structure of the current two will not change.
I think we should have an idea how the co-existence of or transition between two query languages in OpenID4Vp will happen: PE v2 and a new one.
Is one or the other mandatory? for whom? How does the wallet know which query language it is receiving? does this mean we should define a different high level parameter that is not
presentation_definition
for a new query language?