Inconsistent example regarding OP metadata claim request_authentication_signing_alg_values_supported

[cicnavi]

In the description of the OP metadata claim 'request_authentication_signing_alg_values_supported' it is stated that if 'request_object' is one of the 'request_authentication_methods_supported', claim 'request_authentication_signing_alg_values_supported' must be present. However, in the example there is no 'request_authentication_signing_alg_values_supported', while 'request_object' is in 'request_authentication_methods_supported'.

[selfissued]

Thanks Marko. You're right. We need to fix this!