Currently the spec uses jwt-id to describe the JWT ID simple subject format. This is at odds with all of the other simple subject formats that use underscores, like saml_assertion_id, iss_sub and phone_number.
And, in one of the CAEP examples we use the underscore as would be expected. We should update the SSF spec to use jwt_id.
tulshi
commented
1 year ago
Currently the spec uses jwt-id to describe the
JWT IDsimple subject format. This is at odds with all of the other simple subject formats that use underscores, likesaml_assertion_id,iss_subandphone_number.And, in one of the CAEP examples we use the underscore as would be expected. We should update the SSF spec to use
jwt_id.