Closed heaversm closed 10 months ago
Thank you! The repo title is a shortened version of the full paper title. And the abstract and keywords of the paper, though not the title, also have LLM:
Opening up ChatGPT: Tracking openness, transparency, and accountability in instruction-tuned text generators https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571884.3604316 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.05532.pdf
Do you mean the repo might also benefit from having more keywords in the title?
This is a great resource. I had an incredibly difficult time finding it again in my search history because of the title, "Opening up ChatGPT" because I was looking for something that alluded to comparison of LLM models on their open-source characteristics. Think you might improve discoverability by being more explicit there.
Thanks for the resource!