Open arfon opened 4 years ago
Re funding, I would like to see something tiered potentially, where small efforts don't have to pay, but perhaps larger ones do
I would like to see something tiered potentially, where small efforts don't have to pay
Yes, but we have to pay. This is putting the onus on TheOJ to "sponsor" the small efforts that we welcome to use our infra, which makes it more pressing that we be selective.
In general, we need to articulate a process for considering new journals, and perhaps develop an application form.
What about journal topics? Is TheOJ going to focus on scientific journals? Or will it be open to any subject (philosophy and what not). Targeted scope is probably better.
We need to require that they publish ethical guidelines, like we developed for JOSS. We may hint at diversity of the editorial board, and require a minimum number of members (at least five?). We might ask that they be willing to contribute to the general health and maintenance of TheOJ project, somehow.
What about journal topics? Is TheOJ going to focus on scientific journals? Or will it be open to any subject (philosophy and what not).
I don't think there's anything specific we are doing with regards to science - we accept software in non-science fields now in JOSS. Why would we limit this?
I don't think we need to limit potential journals to STEM fields. After all, JOSS doesn't focus on "science" software, but more broadly "research" software which can come from essentially any field.
Currently we have very limited specifications/requirements on what Open Journals publications/journals should be like:
It would be good to expand on these guidelines and potentially include information on: