openjournals / jose-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Education (JOSE)
http://jose.theoj.org
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
33 stars 4 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Teaching Python for Data Science: Collaborative development of a modular & interactive curriculum #119

Closed whedon closed 3 years ago

whedon commented 3 years ago

Submitting author: @bnwolford (Brooke N. Wolford) Repository: https://github.com/GWC-DCMB/curriculum-notebooks/ Version: v0.1.0 Editor: @JasonJWilliamsNY Reviewers: @lechten, @ThomasA Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

:warning: JOSE reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode".

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/bfcfe417b85c7f0b5bf5b9885110c6d0"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/bfcfe417b85c7f0b5bf5b9885110c6d0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/bfcfe417b85c7f0b5bf5b9885110c6d0/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/bfcfe417b85c7f0b5bf5b9885110c6d0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @bnwolford. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@bnwolford if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 3 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSE reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode".

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
whedon commented 3 years ago
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (1108.2 files/s, 466616.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook               109              0          46159           2947
XML                              1              0            129           1790
Markdown                         6            142              0            719
TeX                              1             19              0            224
SVG                              1              0              1            212
YAML                             4             10              4            194
Python                           2             12             10             53
Bourne Shell                     1              0              0              8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           125            183          46303           6147
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository '825ba90356fcc8114529f5f1' was
gathered on 2021/06/27.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Kelly Sovacool                   1            75              0          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Kelly Sovacool               75          100.0          0.0                5.33
whedon commented 3 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

whedon commented 3 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134 is OK
- 10.1145/268084.268127 is OK
- 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008090 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03021 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.3-62.v2 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.06.15.448091 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
labarba commented 3 years ago

@whedon invite @JasonJWilliamsNY as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

@JasonJWilliamsNY has been invited to edit this submission.

labarba commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @JasonJWilliamsNY as editor

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, the editor is @JasonJWilliamsNY

JasonJWilliamsNY commented 3 years ago

@bnwolford thanks very much for your submission. I'll be reviewing and attempting to find reviewers. Please let me know if you have any questions - I'll be updating things on this issue.

JasonJWilliamsNY commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @lechten as reviewer

JasonJWilliamsNY commented 3 years ago

Thanks @lechten for agreeing to review - once we find more reviewer @bnwolford we will begin the review.

labarba commented 3 years ago

@whedon assign @lechten as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @lechten is now a reviewer

lechten commented 3 years ago

Just to be sure: I also wait for the second reviewer, correct?

ThomasA commented 3 years ago

I can offer to review. I have taught Python for Scientific Computing at Aalborg University for several years.

labarba commented 3 years ago

Thank you, @ThomasA, for volunteering to review!

@JasonJWilliamsNY — that gets you to two reviewers, and moves this to review. Allow me to take those steps for you tonight.

labarba commented 3 years ago

@whedon add @ThomasA as reviewer

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, @ThomasA is now a reviewer

labarba commented 3 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 3 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/138.