Closed whedon closed 1 year ago
@whedon generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
It now says Jupyter Project et al. is this acceptable?
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSE! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! πππ¦ππ»π€
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations, @ppxasjsm, your JOSE paper is now published! π
Huge thanks to our Editor: @arm61 and Reviewers: @lucydot, @ghutchis β your contributions make all of this possible π
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00192/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/jose.00192)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/jose.00192">
<img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00192/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00192/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/jose.00192
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Education is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Hi @labarba, I guess I was too eager to get this done and noticed only now that my own ORCID is wrong. Is there any way to still fix this?
oh dear...
@openjournals/dev β Help requested! We have published a paper, and post-publication the author has indicated that there's an error in the ORCID. Are you able to make a fix to an already deposited article?
@ppxasjsm Please note here what the correct ORCID should be.
The ORCID should be: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7512-5252, instead of 0000-0001-5911-0472
Adding double checking ORCIDs to my editor checklist. My apologies for missing this!
I should have also done it! I checked all but my ownβ¦
That should be updated now.
Thank you, Arfon!!
Thanks everyone! And sorry for the hassle.
Submitting author: @ppxasjsm (Antonia S J S Mey) Repository: https://github.com/Edinburgh-Chemistry-Teaching/Data-driven-chemistry Version: 1.1.0 Editor: @arm61 Reviewer: @lucydot, @ghutchis Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7782433
:warning: JOSE reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode".
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@lucydot & @ghutchis, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arm61 know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Review checklist for @lucydot
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Documentation
Pedagogy / Instructional design (Work-in-progress: reviewers, please comment!)
JOSE paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @ghutchis
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Documentation
Pedagogy / Instructional design (Work-in-progress: reviewers, please comment!)
JOSE paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?