[PRE REVIEW]: Scientific programming in Julia - An introductory course

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AndreasKuhn-ak<!--end-author-handle-- (Andreas Kuhn) Repository: https://github.com/AndreasKuhn-ak/WS2022_Julia Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: V1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arm61<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @jarvist, @gcdeshpande Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/f53501246f3b960a2a7bab3797a85546"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/f53501246f3b960a2a7bab3797a85546/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/f53501246f3b960a2a7bab3797a85546/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/f53501246f3b960a2a7bab3797a85546)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @AndreasKuhn-ak. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@AndreasKuhn-ak if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (887.3 files/s, 411943.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                18              0          10687           1974
TOML                             2            254              1           1156
TeX                              1             18              0            261
Julia                            2             43             20            201
Markdown                         2             91              0            121
YAML                             1              1              4             18
JSON                             6              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32            407          10712           3737
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1166

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/d41586-019-02310-3 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1209.5145 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100254 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2109.09973 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.004 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03349 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28792 is OK
- 10.1007/s10614-020-09983-3 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0209358 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2211.02740 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2212.07293 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03349 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[labarba]

@AndreasKuhn-ak 👋 Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[AndreasKuhn-ak]

There are no updates one the paper. I fixed some typos in the course material in the mean time, but that should already be on github.--Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 2/26/24, 00:10 "Lorena A. Barba" @.***> wrote:

@AndreasKuhn-ak 👋 Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper? —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[labarba]

@editorialbot invite @arm61 as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[arm61]

@editorialbot assign @arm61 as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arm61 is now the editor

[arm61]

Hey @AndreasKuhn-ak, welcome to JOSE. Is there anyone that you could recommend, either from your knowledge of Julia people or from this list, as a reviewer?

[arm61]

Thanks @jarvist for agreeing to review this work. Just need to find a second reviewer and then we can get started.

[AndreasKuhn-ak]

I just reviewed the list of potential reviewers, but unfortunately, I don't know any of them well enough to make a recommendation. However, I suggest (if not already done) reaching out to those who have listed Julia as one of their preferred languages. This could include individuals such as gvdr, satish-annigeri, ShahneRodgers, leios, matbesancon, davis68, gcdeshpande, HaoZeke, ma-sadeghi, and ali-ramadhan.

[arm61]

@matbesancon, @gcdeshpande, or @ali-ramadhan would any of you be interested in reviewing this JOSE paper?

[gcdeshpande]

@arm61 sure.

[arm61]

Awesome thanks @gcdeshpande

[arm61]

@editorialbot add @jarvist as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@jarvist added to the reviewers list!

[arm61]

@editorialbot add @gcdeshpande as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@gcdeshpande added to the reviewers list!

[arm61]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/242.