[PRE REVIEW]: An R reproducibility toolkit for the practical researcher

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@paocorrales<!--end-author-handle-- (Paola Corrales) Repository: https://github.com/eliocamp/reproducibility-with-r/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.2.0 Editor: !--editor-->@yabellini<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@Aariq<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a8d8bf5fd7a3b4d169121fedd9994f67"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a8d8bf5fd7a3b4d169121fedd9994f67/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a8d8bf5fd7a3b4d169121fedd9994f67/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a8d8bf5fd7a3b4d169121fedd9994f67)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @paocorrales. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@paocorrales if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.34 s (348.9 files/s, 63997.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                           152          14984            166          22910
SVG                              7              1              3          19636
Sass                            98           1793            244          11009
Markdown                        78           1551              0           4131
JavaScript                      57            942            982           3426
XML                             26            156              0           1200
CSS                             21            139             76            789
TeX                              4             42             30            371
TOML                             4             33             64            305
R                                5             24            142             49
JSON                             5              0              0             45
YAML                             5              0              1             23
Rmd                              5            111            277              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           467          19776           1985          63900
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1073

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5826 may be a valid DOI for title: Spaced Practice

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[labarba]

@paocorrales 👋 Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?

[paocorrales]

Hi! It is good to have news form JOSE :tada: The paper is up to date, nothing has changed since November. Looking forward to the review process!

[labarba]

@editorialbot invite @yabellini as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[yabellini]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @yabellini, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[yabellini]

I accept to be the editor of this submission but I don’t find any command on the bot (or any link on the invitation) to accept. @labarba

[yabellini]

In the meantime @paocorrales if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[labarba]

@editorialbot assign @yabellini as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @yabellini is now the editor

[labarba]

For future reference, @yabellini, you can use the assign command like I did above!

[yabellini]

For future reference, @yabellini, you can use the assign command like I did above!

Good to know. I saw the command but wasn’t clear if I could assign myself. Thanks!

[yabellini]

Hi @mdogucu, you volunteered to be a reviewer for JOSE. We would like to know if you are willing to review this submission.

[yabellini]

Hi @K8hertweck, you volunteered to be a reviewer for JOSE. We would like to know if you are willing to review this submission.

[yabellini]

@editorialbot list reviewers

[editorialbot]

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/jose-reviewers

[yabellini]

@jhollist, @HadrienG can you review this submission for JOSE?

[yabellini]

Hi, @dpshelio. You volunteer to be a reviewer for JOSE. I would like to know if you can review this submission. As teaching is one of your topics, I think you are a good candidate for this work.

[yabellini]

Hi, @kbodwin. You volunteer to be a reviewer for JOSE. I would like to know if you can review this submission. Because of your experience with R and teaching, I think you are a great candidate to review this work.

[mdogucu]

Hi @mdogucu, you volunteered to be a reviewer for JOSE. We would like to know if you are willing to review this submission.

I am sorry but I am unable to review at this time. Could I also be removed from the reviewer list? I had signed up seven years ago but current life circumstances have changed. Thank you for understanding!

[yabellini]

@editorialbot add @Aariq as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Aariq added to the reviewers list!

[yabellini]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/260.