[PRE REVIEW]: AstronomyCalc: A python toolkit for teaching Astronomical Calculations and Data Analysis methods

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sambit-giri<!--end-author-handle-- (Sambit Kumar Giri) Repository: https://github.com/sambit-giri/AstronomyCalc Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arm61<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @kelle, @AstrobioMike Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/2142b8d84b3cc2ce3b130b615a517eaa"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/2142b8d84b3cc2ce3b130b615a517eaa/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/2142b8d84b3cc2ce3b130b615a517eaa/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/2142b8d84b3cc2ce3b130b615a517eaa)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @sambit-giri. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@sambit-giri if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (992.0 files/s, 221865.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                 9              0           6172           2208
Python                          16            219            382            607
TeX                              1             27              0            324
Markdown                         5             61              0            128
YAML                             4             19             26            110
reStructuredText                 9             46             38             95
make                             1              4              7              9
Bourne Shell                     2              6             17              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            47            382           6642           3488
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   113  sambit-giri
     9  Sambit Kumar Giri

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 940

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002 is OK
- 10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21293.x is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx2539 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1341 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv2679 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx649 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz1220 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz2224 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/058 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1786 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
- 10.1007/s10686-013-9334-5 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2018.37 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 is OK
- 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2017564 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using va...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Variation theory and the improvement of teaching a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Introduction to cosmology
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Pantheon+ analysis: cosmological constraints
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The metropolis—hastings algorithm
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Tomographic studies of the 21-cm signal during rei...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hydrogen epoch of reionization array (HERA)

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1109/cidu.2012.6382200 may be a valid DOI for title: Introduction to astroML: Machine learning for astr...
- 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 may be a valid DOI for title: SPARC: Mass models for 175 disk galaxies with Spit...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[sambit-giri]

From the list of people who have agreed to review, I want to suggest Ian Hawke and Michael D. Lee.

[sambit-giri]

@editorialbot When will this submission be assigned reviewers?

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[sambit-giri]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @sambit-giri, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[sambit-giri]

@editorialbot list editors

[editorialbot]

List of JOSE editors

@IanHawke
@JasonJWilliamsNY
@ShanEllis
@acocac
@allisonhorst
@arm61
@ashleefv
@bryanwweber
@csev
@diazrenata
@emckiernan
@jgorzalski
@juanklopper
@kls2177
@kyleniemeyer
@labarba
@lorenanicole
@magsol
@moorepants
@nicoguaro
@quirksahern
@stats-tgeorge
@steflangehennig
@ttimbers
@willingc
@yabellini

[sambit-giri]

@labarba I was wondering if you could kindly provide some insight into how long it typically takes for reviewers to be assigned to a submission.

[arm61]

@editorialbot assign @arm61 as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arm61 is now the editor

[arm61]

Hey @sambit-giri, I will be editing this work. While I try and get some reviewers sorted, could you please check the DOIs that the edtiorialbot has identified here: https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/255#issuecomment-2339266103

[sambit-giri]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[sambit-giri]

@arm61 Thank you! I have updated the missings DOIs.

[arm61]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1108/20468251211179678 is OK
- 10.1109/CIDU.2012.6382200 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 is OK
- 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2_7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002 is OK
- 10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21293.x is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx2539 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1341 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv2679 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx649 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz1220 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz2224 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/058 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1786 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
- 10.1088/1538-3873/129/974/045001 is OK
- 10.1007/s10686-013-9334-5 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2018.37 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 is OK
- 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2017564 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Variation theory and the improvement of teaching a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Introduction to cosmology
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Tomographic studies of the 21-cm signal during rei...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[arm61]

Looks good now. A heads up that the LaTeX has mangled the umlaut containing words in your affiliation. Perhaps take a look at that.

[arm61]

@AstrobioMike would you be interested in reviewing this article?

[sambit-giri]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[sambit-giri]

Looks good now. A heads up that the LaTeX has mangled the umlaut containing words in your affiliation. Perhaps take a look at that.

@arm61 Thank you for noticing this. It should be fixed now.

[AstrobioMike]

@arm61, I'm sorry but i wouldn't be able to for 2-3 weeks unfortunately.

[arm61]

@AstrobioMike 3 weeks time sounds like a great turnaround to me!

[arm61]

@editorialbot add @kelle as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@kelle added to the reviewers list!

[AstrobioMike]

ha, ok @arm61, i'll be on it in a couple weeks 👍

[arm61]

@editorialbot add @AstrobioMike as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@AstrobioMike added to the reviewers list!

[arm61]

Great thanks @kelle and @AstrobioMike for agreeing to review this!

[arm61]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/261.