openjournals / jose-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Education (JOSE)
http://jose.theoj.org
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
33 stars 4 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: KinesinLMS: A Simple and Practical Learning Management System for (Very) Small Teams #257

Open editorialbot opened 2 weeks ago

editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@danielmcquillen<!--end-author-handle-- (Daniel McQuillen) Repository: https://github.com/ScienceCommunicationLab/KinesinLMS Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @danielmcquillen. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@danielmcquillen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002458 is OK
- 10.1007/s44217-024-00143-5 is OK
- 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4958 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hypermedia Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DHH - Ruby on Rails, 37signals, and the Future of ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cookiecutter/Cookiecutter-Django: Cookiecutter Dja...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.68 s (1581.3 files/s, 186063.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         469           9918           8700          39785
JSON                            30              3              0          23004
HTML                           326           3137             65          15900
JavaScript                      27            974            122           6974
Sass                            34           1470             48           5580
TypeScript                      56            546            434           3334
Markdown                        66           1123              0           2522
CSS                             21            158             33            560
SVG                             26              0             19            464
XML                              1              0              0            330
YAML                             6             35             24            186
Bourne Shell                     3             23             18            110
TOML                             1             20             10             80
TeX                              1              6              0             57
INI                              1              0              0              5
reStructuredText                 1              4              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                          1069          17417           9473          98895
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   102  Daniel McQuillen
     8  danielmcquillen
editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1334

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6149-4400) for Daniel McQuillen. ORCID looks to be the wrong length.

danielmcquillen commented 2 weeks ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

danielmcquillen commented 1 week ago

valentina-s suchow stefania11 JasonJWilliamsNY gcdeshpande lechten fbidu Would you be interested in reviewing our paper submission to JOSE on KinesinLMS, an open-source, developer-friendly LMS for small teams?

lechten commented 1 week ago

Thanks for asking, yes, I'm willing to review this. At first glance, spaces are missing after "KinesinLMS" in several places, e.g., l. 52, 74, 82

danielmcquillen commented 1 week ago

@lechten Thanks for your interest! Typos are fixed.

danielmcquillen commented 1 day ago

Hi @lechten Is there anything else we can do to make a review easier for you? Thanks for your time!

lechten commented 1 day ago

Hi @danielmcquillen, currently this issue is called "[PRE REVIEW]". I guess that there should be a new issue or change to "[REVIEW]" before I start. In the past, such issues were accompanied by checklists for reviewers. E.g., see #138...

danielmcquillen commented 6 hours ago

@lechten Hmm. I'm not sure if I have authority to move status to review or to create the review checklist...looks like other issues have an editor assigned. @labarba can you provide any guidance here? Thanks!