Open editorialbot opened 5 days ago
editorialbot
commented
5 days ago Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfReference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.13155316 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e is OK
- 10.1038/253694a0 is OK
- 10.1126/science.1208351 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00022 is OK
- 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00249-x is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 is OK
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.2277 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.21787 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python
❌ MISSING DOIs
- None
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.36 s (61.3 files/s, 26524.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook 9 0 7142 1112
Python 1 103 263 223
Markdown 5 88 0 195
TeX 1 10 0 161
YAML 3 1 10 56
Bourne Shell 1 14 63 35
CSV 1 0 0 26
XML 1 0 0 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 22 216 7478 1826
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Commit count by author:
24 Matteo Degiacomi
17 DEGIACOMI
10 ppxasjsm
3 Toni Mey
1 Micaela MattaPaper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1437
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
editorialbot
commented
5 days ago License info:
🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)
editorialbot
commented
5 days ago :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@degiacom<!--end-author-handle-- (Matteo Degiacomi) Repository: https://github.com/CCPBioSim/BioSim-analysis-workshop Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arm61<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @raquellrios, @djcole56 Archive: Pending Paper kind: learning module
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@raquellrios & @djcole56, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arm61 know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@raquellrios, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist@djcole56, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist