Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
@whedon set 0.1.2 as version
OK. 0.1.2 is the version.
Ok @openjournals/joss-eics this submission is ready to be officially accepted!!! Congrats @jhill1!!
Not really a big deal: but if you are publishing this, maybe it's time for version 1.0?
If it's not really ready for 1.0, it's not ready for publication, either.
@jhill1 — would you like to up you version number? We don't require it: it's up to you.
Leave for now, please. @PythonCHB is right that it should have been made v1.0, but I've already pushed pip and conda updates with 0.12 and referred to the version being the one published. I'd rather keep a cleaner history.
@PythonCHB — you have the "References" item unchecked. Did you find something missing there?
@whedon check references
Attempting to check references...
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.058 is OK
- 10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.079 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.058 is OK
- 10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.079 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/689
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/689, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations, @jhill1, your JOSS paper is published 🚀
Sincere thanks to our editor: @kthyng, and the reviewers: @edoddridge, @PythonCHB — we appreciate your enormous contribution! 🙏
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01112/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01112)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01112">
<img src="http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01112/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: http://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01112/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01112
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: @jhill1 (Jon Hill) Repository: https://github.com/EnvModellingGroup/hdrs Version: 0.1.2 Editor: @kthyng Reviewer: @edoddridge, @PythonCHB Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.2691685
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@edoddridge & @ PythonCHB, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @kthyng know.
✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨
Review checklist for @edoddridge
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @PythonCHB
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?