Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @lheagy it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@lheagy) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon remove @lheagy as editor
Sorry, did not get this one started correctly.
@poulson @jedbrown would either of you be willing to edit this submission? (@lheagy you are welcome to as well, just trying to ensure a relatively even editing load...)
I'm happy to
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
Re reviewer: Anyone into geophysics and python; electromagnetics would be a plus, I guess.
Some people from your list which fit the description: @rowanc1, @leouieda, @WalBytes , @vidalgp, @kbevers, @jkmacc-LANL, @whimian, @rbeucher, @d-chambers.
I saw one typo and some of the reference-bracketing in the compiled version did not turn out as I intended. Is there a way to edit them now or shall I wait for the reviews first?
Thanks @jedbrown and @kyleniemeyer! I know @prisae and am excited to see that he submitted this project 😄. I will definitely be checking out the software, but am happy to let someone else lead the editorial process here.
I'm happy to
I'm glad to see this is getting the proper attention!
@whedon assign @jedbrown as editor
OK, the editor is @jedbrown
Hi @jedbrown. Do I have to do anything at the moment in this regard?
No, sorry about the silence. I re-upped some of my reviewer invitations.
No problem at all. I was just not sure if it is stalled because I haven't done something I was supposed to do.
@whedon add @akelbert as reviewer
OK, @akelbert is now a reviewer
@whedon add @emersodb as reviewer
OK, @emersodb is now a reviewer
@whedon add @lukeolson as reviewer
OK, @lukeolson is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1463. Feel free to close this issue now!
Submitting author: @prisae (Dieter Werthmüller) Repository: https://github.com/empymod/emg3d Version: v0.5.0 Editor: @jedbrown Reviewers: @akelbert, @emersodb, @lukeolson
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @prisae. The JOSS editor @lheagy, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@prisae if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: