search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: cppduals: a nestable vectorized templated dual number library for C++11 #1446

Closed whedon closed 5 years ago

whedon commented 5 years ago

Submitting author: @tesch1 (Michael Tesch) Repository: https://gitlab.com/tesch1/cppduals Version: v0.1.0 Editor: @danielskatz Reviewers: @StewMH, @mdavezac

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tesch1. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@tesch1 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 5 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

whedon commented 5 years ago 
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 5 years ago

:wave: @tesch1 - thanks for your submission to JOSS.

After giving your paper a quick read, I think it would be good to expand a little on this bullet from our paper requirements:

A summary describing the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience

We also have this requirement for our papers:

Mentions (if applicable) of any ongoing research projects using the software or recent scholarly publications enabled by it.

Are there ongoing research projects that make use of this software?

tesch1 commented 5 years ago

Thanks for the quick reply.

I've recalibrated the summary a bit, is there anything more specific about what kind of diverse non-specialist audience is intended? Academics with some math, at least?

Yes, there are ongoing research projects using the software, indeed one of them is mentioned, though there are no citations at this time.

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:20 PM Arfon Smith notifications@github.com wrote:

👋 @tesch1 https://github.com/tesch1 - thanks for your submission to JOSS.

After giving your paper a quick read, I think it would be good to expand a little on this bullet from our paper requirements https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain :

A summary describing the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience

We also have this requirement for our papers:

Mentions (if applicable) of any ongoing research projects using the software or recent scholarly publications enabled by it.

Are there ongoing research projects that make use of this software?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1446?email_source=notifications&email_token=AACOYL6MYI4JRPDCTN5F6YLPVGINXA5CNFSM4HMRKTJKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVI2QDQ#issuecomment-491890702, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACOYL2YXGJ6B7IJLZEKY2TPVGINXANCNFSM4HMRKTJA .

arfon commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago 
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 5 years ago

I've recalibrated the summary a bit, is there anything more specific about what kind of diverse non-specialist audience is intended?

Thanks, I think that addition to the introduction helps.

Could you take a look at this list of potential reviewers and identify any good candidates to review this submission?

arfon commented 5 years ago

@danielskatz - would you be able to edit this submission?

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @tesch1 - I repeat Arfon's request:

Could you take a look at this list of potential reviewers and identify any good candidates to review this submission?

tesch1 commented 5 years ago

Yes, I will have a look.

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 2:02 PM Daniel S. Katz notifications@github.com wrote:

👋 @tesch1 https://github.com/tesch1 - I repeat Arfon's request:

Could you take a look at this list of potential reviewers https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PAPRJ63yq9aPC1COLjaQp8mHmEq3rZUzwUYxTulyu78/edit?usp=sharing and identify any good candidates to review this submission?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1446?email_source=notifications&email_token=AACOYL2FCREDCLYLEMI4IFLPV7V4ZA5CNFSM4HMRKTJKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVWNLRY#issuecomment-493671879, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACOYL5ZIGED3GD3O4YFLDDPV7V4ZANCNFSM4HMRKTJA .

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @tesch1 - Any suggestions?

tesch1 commented 5 years ago

Perhaps @leios, @vyasr, @mlxd, or @StewMH would be good?

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @leios, @vyasr, @mlxd, or @StewMH - would a couple of you be willing to review this for JOSS? Or if not, would you have suggestions for others who might be good fits?

StewMH commented 5 years ago

Hi Dan, Michael,

I'd be happy to review it.

Cheers, Stewart

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

Thanks @StewMH - as soon as we get one more reviewer, we will start the actual review.

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

@whedon assign @StewMH as reviewer

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, the reviewer is @StewMH

mlxd commented 5 years ago

Sorry @tesch1 @danielskatz , don't think that I will have time for the coming 3 weeks. If things haven't moved forward by then, I'll be happy to jump in.

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

Thanks @mlxd - let's see if we can find someone else in this case

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @poulson and @VivianePons - can you help with suggestions for a second reviewer for this submission?

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @mdavezac - you've been suggested as the perfect reviewer for this. Would you be willing to do this? (see JOSS reviewer guidelines)

vyasr commented 5 years ago

Sorry I haven't been more responsive, I unfortunately won't be available to review this paper.

mdavezac commented 5 years ago

I'd be happy to review it.

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

Great, thanks - we'll start the review now then

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

@whedon add @mdavezac as reviewer

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, @mdavezac is now a reviewer

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1487. Feel free to close this issue now!