Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Great!
Could we switch this process to @GullyAPCBurns (my unaffiliated github account?)
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 6:58 PM Roman Valls Guimera notifications@github.com wrote:
@GullyBurns https://github.com/GullyBurns The JOSS editorial team reckons this does not qualify as a COI, so thanks for raising it up but you are free to proceed, no worries.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1526?email_source=notifications&email_token=AK4AALVIMCFAHOR7KCT34ZLQIRL6BA5CNFSM4H3M6U5KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6FF45A#issuecomment-529161844, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK4AALUJMTSNLKYYXXY5Z2LQIRL6BANCNFSM4H3M6U5A .
--
@whedon add @GullyAPCBurns as reviewer
OK, @GullyAPCBurns is now a reviewer
Submitting author: @johnbachman (John Bachman) Repository: https://github.com/indralab/adeft Version: 0.3.0 Editor: @brainstorm Reviewers: @GullyAPCBurns, @gbader, @GullyAPCBurns
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @johnbachman. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@johnbachman if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: