Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @melund, @trallard it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper :tada:.
:star: Important :star:
If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews šæ
To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
Hi @melund your reviewer checklist is at the top šš¼ thanks a lot for your time and effort. Let's use this issue to keep the review alive and use the submitting repo for any longer reviews/discussions.
As per usual if you run into any problems feel free to ping me here!
Thanks, @trallard. I may be a little while before I can get to this. I am going on sommer holiday on Friday. And I will most likely be away from my computer for at least two weeks.
I am sorry, but I am just too busy before I leave to get this done. I will look at it when I get back :)
Hi @melund just checking how you are doing? I am planning to move this forward this week - early the next
@trallard I am traveling in Asia and I only have my phone. I am back in a week and then I will try to get look at this.
@whedon remind @melund in 2 weeks
Reminder set for @melund in 2 weeks
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
/ooo July 25 to August 19
:+1: Marked @trallard as OOO from Thursday, July 25th 2019 to Monday, August 19th 2019. :calendar:
:wave: @melund, please update us on how your review is going.
I am done with my review. I think pulse more than qualifies for JOSS. It is a really good example of how to structure an open-source software project. With the recent addition of conda-forge package, I am also sure that the library will continue to work in the future.
All in all, nice work @finsberg š
Thanks @melund I just noticed that the item for the license has not been checked on your list but I just double checked and this is in compliance. So @finsberg I am going to move to the following editorial activites.
Can you please make sure to perform the following actions:
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon check references
Attempting to check references...
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0593-5 may be missing for title: A novel rule-based algorithm for assigning myocardial fiber orientation to computational heart models
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.07.013 may be missing for title: Estimating cardiac contraction through high resolution data assimilation of a personalized mechanical model
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2982 may be missing for title: Efficient estimation of personalized biventricular mechanical function employing gradient-based optimization
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.034 may be missing for title: A computational method to assess the in vivo stresses and unloaded configuration of patient-specific blood vessels
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon check references
Attempting to check references...
OK DOIs
- 10.1007/s10439-012-0593-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.07.013 is OK
- 10.1002/cnm.2982 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.034 is OK
- 10.1098/rspa.2015.0641 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hey @finsberg you can archive the software in Zenodo and add here the DOI for it
@trallard I forgot to check the license box. Everything is fine now. Good work @finsberg
:wave: @trallard - I think this paper is waiting on you to make your last checks here.
Hi everyone thanks for the ping! I will finalise this today's evening
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon check references
Attempting to check references...
OK DOIs
- 10.1007/s10439-012-0593-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.07.013 is OK
- 10.1002/cnm.2982 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.034 is OK
- 10.1098/rspa.2015.0641 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.3376811 as archive
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.3376811 is the archive.
@whedon set 2019.0 as version
OK. 2019.0 is the version.
@finsberg I have completed my editorial checks and I am willing to recommend this for publication š
@melund thanks for your contribution as a reviewer šš¼
@openjournals/jose-eics I am passing this submission to you for acceptance
@whedon accept
Submitting author: @finsberg (Henrik Nicolay Topnes Finsberg) Repository: https://github.com/finsberg/pulse Version: 2019.0 Editor: @trallard Reviewer: @melund, @trallard Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.3376811
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@melund & @trallard , please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @trallard know.
āØ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks āØ
Review checklist for @melund
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @trallard
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?