Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
👋 @lheagy - would you be willing to edit this submission?
Dear editor,
Since the application of the package will be mainly in the field of ecological observation, it would be nice to have it reviewed by e.g., @ethanwhite or @jhollist in the reviewer list who has an ecology background.
Thank you!
Junbin
Unfortunately I'm already committed on a different submission at the moment.
@karthik - any chance you want to edit this submission? I can't remember what your JOSS-hiatus dates are, but it otherwise would be perfect for you.
:wave: Hey @danielskatz...
Letting you know, @karthik
is currently OOO until Friday, August 30th 2019. :heart:
I am unable to review until about mid to late September. If you still need someone then, ping me again.
Cheers, Jeff
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:16 PM ooo[bot] notifications@github.com wrote:
👋 Hey @danielskatz https://github.com/danielskatz...
Letting you know, @karthik is currently OOO until Friday, August 30th 2019 https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1442#issuecomment-504135320. ❤️
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1646?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABJPYS7R27X2CXEVVTVPAVLQE3HHPA5CNFSM4ILQHFLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD4PBSJA#issuecomment-522066212, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJPYS7IVK3HDAFI4GLP6ZTQE3HHPANCNFSM4ILQHFLA .
-- Jeffrey W. Hollister email: jeff.w.hollister@gmail.com cell: 401 556 4087 https://jwhollister.com
:wave: Hey @jhollist...
Letting you know, @karthik
is currently OOO until Friday, August 30th 2019. :heart:
@usethedata would you be able to edit this submission?
Sorry to be slow in responding -- I'm two weeks out from moving and there are lots of tasks needing attention. Yes, I will review and I have some thoughts for some reviewers to recruit.
@whedon assign @usethedata as editor
OK, the editor is @usethedata
@junbinzhao One thing I see on a quick review is that contribution guidelines are missing. See https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html for what we're looking for.
@trashbirdecology -- Given your R and ecology experience, would you be willing to review this Journal of Open Source Software submission? I'm happy to help you through that process.
@jhollist -- Given your R and ecology experience, would you be willing to review this Journal of Open Source Software submission? Thanks for the reviews you've already done.
@usethedata Community guidelines are added. Thanks!
I am currently reviewing second round of another software and am over extended until the end of October.
Wouldn't be able to get to this review until late September. Could probably have it completed during the week of Sep 30. If that works for all, then I can do the review. If you need it sooner, and find other reviewers, then by all means go that route!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:08 PM Bruce Wilson notifications@github.com wrote:
@jhollist https://github.com/jhollist -- Given your R and ecology experience, would you be willing to review this Journal of Open Source Software submission? Thanks for the reviews you've already done.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1646?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABJPYS2XTUHKSRW2TOHJEA3QGWQVJA5CNFSM4ILQHFLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5JIPBY#issuecomment-525502343, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJPYS7QL7WRELVQHKKON7DQGWQVJANCNFSM4ILQHFLA .
-- Jeffrey W. Hollister email: jeff.w.hollister@gmail.com cell: 401 556 4087 https://jwhollister.com
I am good with the time given.
From: Jeffrey W Hollister notifications@github.com Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:45 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com Cc: junbinzhao junbinzhao1985@gmail.com; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: FluxCalR: a R package for calculating CO2 and CH4 fluxes from static chambers (#1646)
Wouldn't be able to get to this review until late September. Could probably have it completed during the week of Sep 30. If that works for all, then I can do the review. If you need it sooner, and find other reviewers, then by all means go that route!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:08 PM Bruce Wilson notifications@github.com wrote:
@jhollist https://github.com/jhollist -- Given your R and ecology experience, would you be willing to review this Journal of Open Source Software submission? Thanks for the reviews you've already done.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1646?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABJPYS2XTUHKSRW2TOHJEA3QGWQVJA5CNFSM4ILQHFLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5JIPBY#issuecomment-525502343, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJPYS7QL7WRELVQHKKON7DQGWQVJANCNFSM4ILQHFLA .
-- Jeffrey W. Hollister email: jeff.w.hollister@gmail.com cell: 401 556 4087 https://jwhollister.com
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1646?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJKTYFY5BOO4WBEBGX2B3Z3QH2BAFA5CNFSM4ILQHFLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5YUNWQ#issuecomment-527517402 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJKTYF7UPYZWGF36X777YSTQH2BAFANCNFSM4ILQHFLA .
Alrighty! I will plan on having this review completed during the week of Sep 30.
@whedon assign @arfon as editor
OK, the editor is @arfon
:wave: just a heads up @junbinzhao that I'm going to help out @usethedata and take on this submission for him.
@whedon add @jhollist as reviewer
OK, @jhollist is now a reviewer
@molgor @ha0ye @giskid @SteveViss - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Hi guys,
Thank you for your email. I'm afraid I can't review any paper at the moment. I'm in the last month(s) of my PhD and I'm still have lots of things to do. I'll be happy to review papers after January.
All the best and good luck
Juan
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:32 PM Arfon Smith notifications@github.com wrote:
@molgor https://github.com/molgor @ha0ye https://github.com/ha0ye @GISKid https://github.com/GISKid @SteveViss https://github.com/SteveViss - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1646?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAKQ4VXU475L3WTZG7OWU5TQKNPLVA5CNFSM4ILQHFLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7DEZ2Q#issuecomment-533089514, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKQ4VQYMO64HSKYJBU3LPLQKNPLVANCNFSM4ILQHFLA .
-- Nehuatl yoliliztli nicoyotl.
All the best and good luck
No problem. And best of luck to you too!
I am able, though please check with @kthyng re: #1550. It sounded like maybe @ethanwhite is committed to that submission, in which case, I'd be happy to be redirected over to this one.
I am able, though please check with @kthyng re: #1550. It sounded like maybe @ethanwhite is committed to that submission, in which case, I'd be happy to be redirected over to this one.
👍 got it, thanks. @kthyng - are you OK for this submission to move forward with @ha0ye as a reviewer?
Yes, I still need to hear from @ethanwhite but @ha0ye had a bit of a conflict anyway so better not to have him as a reviewer. So, go for it!
@whedon add @ha0ye as reviewer
OK, @ha0ye is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1751. Feel free to close this issue now!
Thanks folks, see you over in #1751
Submitting author: @junbinzhao (Junbin Zhao) Repository: https://github.com/junbinzhao/FluxCalR/ Version: 0.1.0. Editor: @arfon Reviewers: @jhollist, @ha0ye
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @junbinzhao. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@junbinzhao if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: