openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: feign: a Python package to estimate geometric efficiency in passive gamma spectroscopy measurements of nuclear fuel #1649

Closed whedon closed 5 years ago

whedon commented 5 years ago

Submitting author: @ezsolti (Zsolt Elter) Repository: https://github.com/ezsolti/feign/ Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @katyhuff Reviewers: @kellyrowland, @sskutnik

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ezsolti. The JOSS editor @katyhuff, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@ezsolti if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 5 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @katyhuff it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@katyhuff) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

PDF failed to compile for issue #1649 with the following error:

Error reading bibliography ./paper.bib (line 17, column 1): unexpected "t" expecting space, ",", white space or "}" Error running filter pandoc-citeproc: Filter returned error status 1 Looks like we failed to compile the PDF

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @katyhuff - this submission requested you as the editor, and this seemed like such a good fit that I just left it that way - please let me know if this is not ok.

danielskatz commented 5 years ago

👋 @ezsolti - please merge https://github.com/ezsolti/feign/pull/6 and then enter a new comment here: @whedon generate pdf - if there are additional problems, please make changes to the source and regenerate the pdf until you are happy with it.

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

I can definitely take this one. Thanks @danielskatz .

@ezsolti : We can begin requesting reviewers when ezsolti/feign#6 is merged and when you are happy with the PDF that builds from @whedon generate pdf . I have some reviewers in mind, though your suggestions are certainly welcome. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. This list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@whedon generate pdf

whedon commented 5 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 5 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@katyhuff : Hello! Thank you for taking care of the paper. I reached a pdf what I'm more or less satisfied with (besides that a cite to a conference paper doesn't want to render correctly, what ever I do). I have reviewers in mind only from the safeguards side, so maybe it is better to go with your suggestions.

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

@ezsolti :

Ok -- I'll start asking for reviewers. (nonproliferation and safeguards suggestions are just as welcome as anyone else, so don't hesitate to suggest anyone.).

How would you like the citation to render?

katyhuff commented 5 years ago
ezsolti commented 5 years ago

@katyhuff : In that case Stefano Vaccaro (author of one of the cited papers: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900216307707) might be a good candidate.

For the 'Partial defect identification in PWR spent fuel using Passive Gamma Spectroscopy' paper the Proceedings doesn't want to appear, also when referenced all surnames appear instead of (Elter et al., 2018).

kellyrowland commented 5 years ago

Hi @katyhuff , thanks for reaching out - I am interested in and able to take on this review.

katyhuff commented 5 years ago
katyhuff commented 5 years ago

@whedon assign @kellyrowland as reviewer

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, the reviewer is @kellyrowland

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

Thank you @kellyrowland! I'll ping you when we have enough reviewers to begin the review.

Thank you @ezsolti : Thank you for your suggestion, I'll look into including Stefano Vaccaro as a reviewer.

sskutnik commented 5 years ago

Hi @katyhuff I'd be happy to serve as a reviewer.

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

Fantastic @sskutnik , thank you.

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

@whedon add @sskutnik as reviewer

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, @sskutnik is now a reviewer

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 5 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1650. Feel free to close this issue now!

katyhuff commented 5 years ago

Ok, folks, let's move over to #1650 to conduct the review. In that issue, each of you have a checklist. Please make sure that you have notifications turned on in issue #1650 and that you have at some point completed the reviewer signup form. https://joss.theoj.org/reviewer-signup.html