Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
Hi @VivianePons, can you edit this submission?
:wave: Hey @kyleniemeyer...
Letting you know, @VivianePons
is currently OOO until Thursday, October 3rd 2019. :heart:
@poulson can you edit this submission?
Hey @kyleniemeyer thanks for helping out in finding an editor for our submission! I assume I can post here the people I can think could be helpful in reviewing, correct?
@nquesada sure, suggestions for potential reviewers are always welcome!
Great! From the list of potential reviewers JOSS has, I think either @goerz or @PhilipVinc would make good reviewers given their background in quantum optics.
I'm currently reviewing another paper, so unfortunately I can't take this on at the moment
I am available for reviewing the paper.
Thanks @PhilipVinc!
@whedon add @PhilipVinc as reviewer
Thanks @PhilipVinc !
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #1668 with the following error:
Error reading bibliography ./paper.bib (line 208, column 1): unexpected end of input expecting space, ",", white space or "}" Error running filter pandoc-citeproc: Filter returned error status 1 Looks like we failed to compile the PDF
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon assign @poulson as editor
OK, the editor is @poulson
Oh my -- this is my kind of submission, and even local to Toronto! I apologize for the delay and -- reading through it -- am immediately curious about the interpretations of combining the halfnian generalization of the permanent with the immanantal generalization -- via characters of the symmetric group -- of permanents and determinants. I suppose one would just introduce an arbitrary character of the symmetric group rather than chi(sigma) == 1 in the case of the halfnian.
I will send out invitations to reviewers as soon as I finish reading the paper.
Hey @poulson, thanks for agreeing to be editor of our paper; also, very happy to hear you find our paper interesting!
Hi Max Scheurer (@maxscheurer): given your CPPE project (https://github.com/maxscheurer/cppe), which exposes a python interface for an Eigen-based C++ quantum chemistry simulation, it looks like your expertise would be helpful for reviewing this submission.
While the submission is more focused around combinatorial determinant calculations of structured matrices, my guess is that this isn't too much of a stretch for you.
Please let me know if you have the time and interest to review this submission, and would feel confident doing so.
Hi, I think this is out of my field of expertise, so I don't feel capable to review the manuscript. Sorry...
@poulson, should you ask Whedon to start the review issue so that I can fill the checklist?
I have a few minor comments on this library, especially on the documentation, which otherwise seems a very fine piece of software. Normally I would leave those on the Review issue?
@whedon assign @katyhuff as editor
OK, the editor is @katyhuff
@whedon add @poulson as reviewer
OK, @poulson is now a reviewer
Hi Folks (@PhilipVinc @nquesada ), I am stepping in as editor because this content is fairly niche, but Jack (@paulson)and I believe he will be an excellent second reviewer for this work. It was a great idea on Jack's part, and I'm happy to take over handing this one. Now that we have two reviewers and one editor, let's get started on the review.
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1705. Feel free to close this issue now!
Ok folks, let's move over to #1705 , where @PhilipVinc and @poulson will conduct the review.
Submitting author: @nquesada (Nicolás Quesada) Repository: https://github.com/xanaduAI/thewalrus Version: 0.7.0 Editor: @katyhuff Reviewers: @PhilipVinc, @poulson
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nquesada. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@nquesada if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: