[PRE REVIEW]: tabula: An R Package for Analysis, Seriation and Visualization of Archaeological Count Data

[whedon]

Submitting author: @nfrerebeau (Nicolas Frerebeau) Repository: https://github.com/nfrerebeau/tabula Version: v1.3.0 Editor: @oliviaguest Reviewers: @izaromanowska, @soodoku

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nfrerebeau. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@nfrerebeau if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[kthyng]

Hi @oliviaguest! Could you edit this submission?

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[oliviaguest]

@kthyng I am very far from having expertise in this area and am currently editing 3 others — does it matter? If not, then, sure. 😊

[kthyng]

@oliviaguest generally you don't need too much specific expertise, and you're on the lower end of editor load, but I know I've asked you to take on submissions this week! I can try another editor first though.

@karthik this submission looks to be more in your area of expertise. Would you edit this submission?

[karthik]

@kthyng Sorry I dont have bandwidth to handle.

[kthyng]

@oliviaguest Could you take this on then after all? I'd appreciate it if possible!

[oliviaguest]

Yes, @kthyng. I am starting a new job and moving house this week and next week. Is it OK to have a bit of a delay?

[danielskatz]

Yes, let's go ahead and do that - I'll assign it you with the recognition that there will be a ~2-week delay.

Dan (newly on-duty as JOSS AEiC this week)

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @oliviaguest as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @oliviaguest

[oliviaguest]

@danielskatz thank you!

[oliviaguest]

Hi 👋 @soodoku would you be interested and available to review this?

[oliviaguest]

@whedon add @izaromanowska as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @izaromanowska is now a reviewer

[oliviaguest]

@soodoku I missed the thumbs up, I assume that's a yes? excellent!

[soodoku]

yup

[oliviaguest]

@whedon add @soodoku as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @soodoku is now a reviewer

[oliviaguest]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1821. Feel free to close this issue now!

[oliviaguest]

@izaromanowska, @soodoku :wave:

Please head on to the actual review here: #1821