Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #1781 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
Hi @cimentadaj, thanks for your submission. Before we get started, can you please rename the article source file to paper.md
? Our automated build system requires the article to be called that, though it can be located anywhere in the repo.
@karthik can you edit this R submission?
Thanks @kyleniemeyer, I renamed everything to paper.*
so all should be set. From reviewing the list , I think @rmhogervorst, @lebebr01, @mkearney or @briatte could be reviewers.
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
Dear all,
I'd be happy to review the package, although let me admit that I'm biased, since I know @cimentadaj's excellent work on other survey-related packages :)
All the best,
François
Yes, for full disclosure, @briatte has helped out on other packages.
@kyleniemeyer Unfortunately my editorial plate is too full to handle this. :/
@whedon assign @majensen as editor
OK, the editor is majensen
@whedon assign @briatte as reviewer
OK, the reviewer is @briatte
@amoeba, would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? Thanks for considering!
Hey @majensen, sure. I can have my review in by the end of next week, on October 18th. Sound good?
Awesome @amoeba, much appreciated!
@whedon add @amoeba as reviewer
OK, @amoeba is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1796. Feel free to close this issue now!
Closing prereview - please head on over to #1796
Submitting author: @cimentadaj (Jorge Cimentada) Repository: https://github.com/cimentadaj/perccalc/ Version: v1.0.4 Editor: @majensen Reviewers: @briatte, @amoeba
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cimentadaj. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@cimentadaj if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: