Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
@terrytangyuan I have added missing DOIs to the .bib file.
@whedon check references
Attempting to check references...
OK DOIs
- 10.18653/v1/n16-3020 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2018-072 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01444 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00786 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2017-016 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
OK DOIs
- 10.18653/v1/n16-3020 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2018-072 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01444 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00786 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2017-016 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1084
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1084, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
This paper looks good to me now! Handing over to @openjournals/joss-eics!
Hi @hbaniecki, I made a few edits to the paper and references, if you could merge these: https://github.com/ModelOriented/modelStudio/pull/31 and https://github.com/ModelOriented/modelStudio/pull/32
Hi @kyleniemeyer, I merged your PR.
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@hbaniecki sorry, one last fix I noticed when reviewing: https://github.com/ModelOriented/modelStudio/pull/33
@kyleniemeyer np. I merged.
@whedon generate pdf
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
OK DOIs
- 10.18653/v1/n16-3020 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2018-072 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01444 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00786 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2017-016 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1090
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1090, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘
Any issues? notify your editorial technical team...
Congrats @hbaniecki on your article's publication in JOSS! Many thanks to @acolum and @expectopatronum for reviewing this, and @terrytangyuan for editing.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01798/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01798)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01798">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01798/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01798/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01798
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
wow even after so many reviews i can see a typo. @kyleniemeyer is it possible to fix the paper after the publication?
Oh no! Um, I think so. Can you fix the source file and let us know? (@arfon?)
I feel ashamed but hope that it can be updated. Fixed paper.md
.
Oh no! Um, I think so. Can you fix the source file and let us know? (@arfon?)
No problem. Paper updated based on the latest paper.md
in master
. FWIW, the new PDF might not show up for a few hours as there's caching in place for the PDFs on the JOSS site.
Submitting author: @hbaniecki (Hubert Baniecki) Repository: https://github.com/ModelOriented/modelStudio Version: v0.1.9 Editor: @terrytangyuan Reviewer: @acolum, @expectopatronum Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.3527770
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@acolum & @expectopatronum, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @terrytangyuan know.
✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨
Review checklist for @acolum
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @expectopatronum
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper