Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
π¦π¦π¦ π Tweet for this paper π π¦π¦π¦
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! πππ¦ππ»π€
Any issues? notify your editorial technical team...
@jgonggrijp, @elektrobohemian - many thanks for your reviews here β¨
@statsmaths - your paper is now accepted into JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01800/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01800)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01800">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01800/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01800/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01800
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- 10.1093/digitalsh/fqz013 is OK
- 10.22148/16.043 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_5 is OK
- 10.1109/fg.2018.00020 is OK
- 10.1007/3-540-45103-x_50 is OK
- 10.5749/movingimage.18.1.0080 is OK
- 10.1109/fg.2017.82 is OK
- 10.1109/tsp.2015.7296366 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-04212-7_44 is OK
- 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 is OK
- 10.1109/saner.2017.7884606 is OK
- 10.1093/llc/fqy085 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Submitting author: @statsmaths (Taylor Arnold) Repository: https://github.com/distant-viewing/dvt Version: v0.3.0 Editor: @arfon Reviewer: @jgonggrijp, @elektrobohemian Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.3614034
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@jgonggrijp & @elektrobohemian, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
β¨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks β¨
Review checklist for @jgonggrijp
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @elektrobohemian
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper