Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- 10.1029/WR006i005p01296 is OK
- 10.1016/S0167-5648(09)70009-7 is OK
- 10.1029/2002WR001728 is OK
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.09.008 is OK
- 10.1002/esp.1369 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.043 is OK
- 10.1002/2014WR015809 is OK
- 10.1002/2013WR013918 is OK
- 10.1029/WR007i005p01256 is OK
- 10.1126/science.aaf7891 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.002 is OK
- 10.1029/92WR00802 is OK
- 10.5194/esurf-5-21-2017 is OK
- 10.1002/hyp.8319 is OK
- 10.1029/2008WR007536 is OK
- 10.1029/2006WR005752 is OK
- 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1290
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/1290, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
π¦π¦π¦ π Tweet for this paper π π¦π¦π¦
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! πππ¦ππ»π€
Any issues? notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations to @DavidLitwin on your new publication! Thanks to reviewers @dvalters and @rreinecke for your time and expertise.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01935/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01935)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01935">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01935/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01935/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01935
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: @davidlitwin (David Litwin) Repository: https://github.com/landlab/landlab Version: v2.0.0b5 Editor: @kthyng Reviewers: @dvalters, @rreinecke Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.3660698
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@dvalters & @rreinecke, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @kthyng know.
β¨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks β¨
Review checklist for @dvalters
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @rreinecke
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper