Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting to check references...
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27479v2 may be missing for title: ProPheno 1.0: An Online Dataset for Accelerating the Complete Characterization of the Human Protein-phenotype Landscape in Biomedical Literature
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-2307 may be missing for title: Sub-word information in pre-trained biomedical word representations: evaluation and hyper-parameter optimization
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198030 may be missing for title: Data-driven analysis of biomedical literature suggests broad-spectrum benefits of culinary herbs and spices
- https://doi.org/10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2019.00217 may be missing for title: Parallel Computing for Large-Scale Author Name Disambiguation in MEDLINE
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hi @titipata, it looks like your article is missing DOIs for a number of the references; could you add those? Please review all the references (including their formatting), in case others are missing DOIs as well.
Hi @majensen, could you edit this one for us?
Hi @kyleniemeyer, definitely, thank you! I added the missing DOIs and will check the other references.
@kyleniemeyer here is my list other potential reviewers: Gweissman, stensy, timClicks, tleonardi, dmnfarrell, cbrueffer, ethanwhite, dsurujon, and skummerf
update: I added missing DOIs of the references
@whedon assign @majensen as editor
OK, the editor is @majensen
Thanks a lot @majensen and @kyleniemeyer! Let me know if you need any help providing an extra list of suggested reviewers!
@titipata sorry for wait, want to get on this tonight.
No worry @majensen! Thanks in advance!
Hello @timClicks -- would you be willing to review this article (#1951) for JOSS? Thanks for your consideration! --@majensen
Hey @tleonardi, would you have time to review this article (#1951) for JOSS? Grazie! --@majensen
Happy to @majensen.
@timClicks very much appreciated -- thanks!
@whedon assign @timClicks as reviewer
OK, the reviewer is @timClicks
Thanks, @majensen and @timClicks for reviewing!
Hi @majensen would love too this paper, but I already have too many commitments before the end of the year. If needed I'd be happy to review it in early January.
@majensen @tleonardi I am happy to wait until early January! I am in no rush during the holiday period.
@tleonardi thanks very much -- @titipata is ok with that and so am I. Very much appreciated!
@whedon add @tleonardi as reviewer
OK, @tleonardi is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1979. Feel free to close this issue now!
@titipata @timClicks @tleonardi we'll begin reviewing over at #1979. Thanks again all and Happy Holidays!
Submitting author: @titipata (Titipat Achakulvisut) Repository: https://github.com/titipata/pubmed_parser Version: v0.2.1 Editor: @majensen Reviewers: @timClicks, @tleonardi
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @titipata. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@titipata if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: