openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Pubmed Parser: A Python Parser for PubMed Open-Access XML Subset and MEDLINE XML Dataset XML Dataset #1951

Closed whedon closed 4 years ago

whedon commented 4 years ago

Submitting author: @titipata (Titipat Achakulvisut) Repository: https://github.com/titipata/pubmed_parser Version: v0.2.1 Editor: @majensen Reviewers: @timClicks, @tleonardi

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @titipata. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@titipata if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
whedon commented 4 years ago

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

whedon commented 4 years ago
Attempting to check references...
whedon commented 4 years ago
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
whedon commented 4 years ago

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27479v2 may be missing for title: ProPheno 1.0: An Online Dataset for Accelerating the Complete Characterization of the Human Protein-phenotype Landscape in Biomedical Literature
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-2307 may be missing for title: Sub-word information in pre-trained biomedical word representations: evaluation and hyper-parameter optimization
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198030 may be missing for title: Data-driven analysis of biomedical literature suggests broad-spectrum benefits of culinary herbs and spices
- https://doi.org/10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2019.00217 may be missing for title: Parallel Computing for Large-Scale Author Name Disambiguation in MEDLINE

INVALID DOIs

- None
kyleniemeyer commented 4 years ago

Hi @titipata, it looks like your article is missing DOIs for a number of the references; could you add those? Please review all the references (including their formatting), in case others are missing DOIs as well.

kyleniemeyer commented 4 years ago

Hi @majensen, could you edit this one for us?

titipata commented 4 years ago

Hi @kyleniemeyer, definitely, thank you! I added the missing DOIs and will check the other references.

titipata commented 4 years ago

@kyleniemeyer here is my list other potential reviewers: Gweissman, stensy, timClicks, tleonardi, dmnfarrell, cbrueffer, ethanwhite, dsurujon, and skummerf

update: I added missing DOIs of the references

majensen commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @majensen as editor

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, the editor is @majensen

titipata commented 4 years ago

Thanks a lot @majensen and @kyleniemeyer! Let me know if you need any help providing an extra list of suggested reviewers!

majensen commented 4 years ago

@titipata sorry for wait, want to get on this tonight.

titipata commented 4 years ago

No worry @majensen! Thanks in advance!

majensen commented 4 years ago

Hello @timClicks -- would you be willing to review this article (#1951) for JOSS? Thanks for your consideration! --@majensen

majensen commented 4 years ago

Hey @tleonardi, would you have time to review this article (#1951) for JOSS? Grazie! --@majensen

timClicks commented 4 years ago

Happy to @majensen.

majensen commented 4 years ago

@timClicks very much appreciated -- thanks!

majensen commented 4 years ago

@whedon assign @timClicks as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, the reviewer is @timClicks

titipata commented 4 years ago

Thanks, @majensen and @timClicks for reviewing!

tleonardi commented 4 years ago

Hi @majensen would love too this paper, but I already have too many commitments before the end of the year. If needed I'd be happy to review it in early January.

titipata commented 4 years ago

@majensen @tleonardi I am happy to wait until early January! I am in no rush during the holiday period.

majensen commented 4 years ago

@tleonardi thanks very much -- @titipata is ok with that and so am I. Very much appreciated!

majensen commented 4 years ago

@whedon add @tleonardi as reviewer

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, @tleonardi is now a reviewer

majensen commented 4 years ago

@whedon start review

whedon commented 4 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1979. Feel free to close this issue now!

majensen commented 4 years ago

@titipata @timClicks @tleonardi we'll begin reviewing over at #1979. Thanks again all and Happy Holidays!