Closed whedon closed 4 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.16 s (195.9 files/s, 34438.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 22 250 1428 2072
HTML 1 88 5 408
Rmd 4 218 481 305
TeX 1 14 0 158
Markdown 2 48 0 128
YAML 1 1 1 18
Dockerfile 1 1 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 32 620 1915 3091
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41746-019-0090-4 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01778 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v059.i10 is OK
- 10.1038/s41746-019-0078-0 is OK
- 10.1038/s41746-019-0084-2 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121036 is OK
- 10.1145/3341162.3346277 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3563546 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0178-x may be missing for title: Detecting the impact of subject characteristics on machine learning-based diagnostic applications
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3267612 may be missing for title: Remote Assessment, in Real-World Setting, of Tremor Severity in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Using Smartphone Inertial Sensors
INVALID DOIs
- None
👋 @trallard - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?
👋 @trallard - a 2nd ping...
Hey @danielskatz sure, assign this to me!
Thanks @trallard - you can do it yourself by doing what I do in the next command :)
@whedon assign @trallard as editor
OK, the editor is @trallard
@philerooski let's start by finding some reviewers. Have you got someone in mind already? if not you can check the list of registered reviewers :https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers and suggest some (⚠️ please make sure to not use the @ when adding their names to this issue)
@trallard There is a paper similar to this that has been published in JOSS (https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01778) that was reviewed by Abhishektha Boppana (abhishektha
), although this reviewer is not familiar with R. Arne Küderle (AKuederle
) is familiar with the conceptual aspects of this paper (IMUs, motion/gait analysis), but they do not list R as a programming language that they are familiar with, either. There are many reviewers familiar with both R and bioinformatics: Ebedthan
, kanekalla
, dcassol
, ...
Hi, all I am the editor for this submission and we are looking for at least 2 reviewers to move forward.
@abhishektha Abhishek, are you willing and able to review this submission? @AKuederle Arne, are you willing and able to review this submission? @Ebedthan Anicet, are you willing and able to review this submission? @kanekalla Kishore, are you willing and able to review this submission?
Yes I'll do.
Send me details please. Regards. On Feb 3 2020, at 6:29 pm, Tania Allard notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi, all I am the editor for this submission and we are looking for at least 2 reviewers to move forward.
@abhishektha (https://github.com/abhishektha) Abhishek, are you willing and able to review this submission? @AKuederle (https://github.com/AKuederle) Arne, are you willing and able to review this submission? @Ebedthan (https://github.com/Ebedthan) Anicet, are you willing and able to review this submission? @kanekalla (https://github.com/kanekalla) Kishore, are you willing and able to review this submission?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2000?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEEDMFMAJD57VU34RQ3USOTRBBPCHA5CNFSM4KD26OM2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEKU4N7I#issuecomment-581551869), or unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEEDMFNTGTX3REX7642C3LDRBBPCHANCNFSM4KD26OMQ).
Yes, I would be willing to, but because of my limited R knowledge, I might not be able to comment on aspects of code quality and correctness (?). If this is not an issue, I would be happy to perform the review.
:wave: @trallard - it looks like @Ebedthan and @AKuederle are happy to review here so once they're assigned, the main review thread can be started.
Apologies for the delay my OOO extended and forgot to update. Moving this forward now
@whedon assign @Ebedthan as reviewer
OK, @Ebedthan is now a reviewer
@whedon add @AKuederle as reviewer
OK, @AKuederle is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2106.
Submitting author: @philerooski (Phillip Snyder) Repository: https://github.com/Sage-Bionetworks/mhealthtools Version: 0.2.0 Editor: @trallard Reviewers: @Ebedthan, @AKuederle
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @philerooski. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@philerooski if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: